Reinerd v. A.B. Chance Co., WD

Decision Date20 November 1990
Docket NumberNo. WD,WD
Citation800 S.W.2d 777
PartiesPaul Corley REINERD, Appellant, v. A.B. CHANCE COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents. 43393.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Russell C. Still, Columbia, for appellant.

Raymond J. Flunker, Jeffrey M. Proske, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before BERREY, P.J., and FENNER and ULRICH, JJ.

BERREY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's final award denying compensation to appellant on April 27, 1990.

Appellant was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with A.B. Chance Company on April 11, 1983. Appellant testified concerning the accident and two medical reports were received in evidence. Dr. Garth Russell's report of June 10, 1988, rated appellant's permanent partial impairment to be 60% as rated at the lumbar spine or body as a whole. Also received was Dr. Russell's report of November 21, 1988, rating appellant's disability at 40% of the body as a whole.

The administrative law judge found claimant to be entitled to 240 weeks of permanent partial disability, less employer's credit. This was calculated as "212 4/7 weeks, i.e., 264 4/7 weeks of temporary total disability paid less the 52-week healing period." He then calculated that appellant was to be paid 27 3/7 weeks of compensation at a rate of $113.69 per week for a total amount of--$3,118.36.

Subsequently on August 18, 1989, the administrative law judge modified his order as follows:

The Employer's credit is calculated incorrectly and should be based on a temporary total disability rate of $187.73 which results in a credit of $39,906.06. Because this credit exceeds the amount of permanent partial disability awarded to Claimant of $27,285.60, no further payment is due from the Employer/Insurer in this case.

The appellant alleges the trial court erred in affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge because the respondents were not allowed credit for the amount of temporary total disability paid in excess of 52 weeks.

Pursuant to § 287.170, RSMo 1982, appellant began receiving temporary total benefits on April 11, 1983. At that time § 287.190, RSMo 1981, provided a credit to the employer for any payment made in excess of the initial 52 week healing period. Section 287.190 was subsequently amended as of September 28, 1983, and as amended there was no provision for credit back to the employer.

The initial 52-week period ended April 11, 1984. Payments continued into 1988 for a total of 264 4/7 weeks, leaving a credit under the Act in effect at the time of appellant's injury of 212 4/7 weeks times the weekly compensation rate of $187.73. Appellant would have the 1983 amendment, which became effective after the accident, applied retroactively, thus, avoiding the credit back to the employer/insurer of 212 4/7 weeks.

Art. I, § 13 of the Missouri Constitution provides that no law "retrospective in its operation" may be enacted. There are exceptions: (1) when the legislature specifically provides that the statute have retroactive effect and; (2) when the statute is procedural or remedial only and the substantive rights of parties are not affected. State ex rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Buder, 515 S.W.2d 409, 410 (Mo. banc 1974).

The statutes at issue are § 287.190, RSMo 1981 and § 287.190, RSMo 1983. They provide as follows:

[T]he employer shall pay to the employee for a healing period, a period of not to exceed fifty-two weeks of that compensation allowed for temporary total disability under section 287.170 or temporary partial disability under ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Hess v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., No. WD 64370 (MO 3/28/2006)
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 28 March 2006
    ...645, 647 (Mo. App. 1997); Cartwright v. Wells Fargo Armored Services, 921 S.W.2d 165, 167 (Mo. App. 1996); Reinerd v. A.B. Chance Co., 800 S.W.2d 777, 778 (Mo. App. 1990); Danaher v. Smith, 666 S.W.2d 452, 455 (Mo. App. 1984), although not relying on Callahan, have mistakenly referred to le......
  • Bowman v. Zenith Radio Corp., 19417
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 16 March 1995
    ...of the employee." At the time of the injury to Claimant, however, § 287.250, RSMo 1986, was applicable. See Reinerd v. A.B. Chance Co., 800 S.W.2d 777, 778 (Mo.App.W.D.1990). That version of the statute did not contain the provision excluding fringe benefits from the calculations. It provid......
  • Pierce v. State, Dept. of Social Services
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 26 May 1998
    ...when the statute is procedural or remedial only and the substantive rights of [the] parties are not affected." Reinerd v. A.B. Chance Co., 800 S.W.2d 777, 778 (Mo.App.1990). See also Schweigert v. Braxton, 902 S.W.2d 370, 372 As for the first exception for statutes where the legislature spe......
  • General Motors Corp. v. City of Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 10 January 1995
    ...(2) the statute is solely remedial or procedural and does not affect the substantive rights of the parties. See Reinerd v. A.B. Chance Co., 800 S.W.2d 777, 778 (Mo.App.1990). GM's situation does not concern a question of retroactivity, In Armco, the Supreme Court addressed an issue of first......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT