Rennie v. Red Star Oil Co.
Decision Date | 04 May 1920 |
Docket Number | 9684. |
Citation | 190 P. 391,78 Okla. 208,1920 OK 202 |
Parties | RENNIE v. RED STAR OIL CO. ET AL. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
In an oil and gas lease, the lessee is entitled to the possession of the lands so leased to the extent reasonably necessary to perform the obligations imposed on the lessee by the terms of the lease.
Where the lessee ceases operations under a lease, such cesser alone is not sufficient to establish abandonment. As to whether or not the lessee has abandoned the premises depends upon all the circumstances of the particular case. If the lessor acquiesces in the cesser of operations or fails to act in a manner indicating he considered the leased premises abandoned, he may be restrained from interfering with the lessee in removing casing, pipes, and other improvements erected by the lessee upon the premises, where the lease specifically gives the lessee the right to remove such casing, pipes, and other improvements at any time.
Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
A demurrer to plaintiff's evidence admits the truth thereof, and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.
Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge.
Action for injunction by the Red Star Oil Company and others against H. C. Rennie. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
Samuel A. Boorstin and C. R. Thurwell, both of Tulsa (Carl M. Beren of Tulsa, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
H. B Martin and R. A. Reynolds, both of Tulsa, for defendants in error.
The defendant in error was lessee in an oil and gas lease executed by W. E. Chastain on the 19th day of July, 1913, the lease containing the following provisions:
It appears that the lessee entered into possession of the lands described in the lease and drilled the three wells within the specified time. The wells produced a small quantity of oil for a time, but did not prove profitable, and the lessee ceased operations. The total amount expended in developing the lease was approximately $15,000. Some time thereafter the buildings erected by the lessee upon the leased premises, together with the tanks, were destroyed by fire.
A short time prior to the institution of this action the lessor sold the land covered by the lease to plaintiff in error. After the purchase of the lands by plaintiff in error the lessee arranged to draw the casings and remove the pipes and other improvements placed on the land by the lessee, but when...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
CHAPTER 1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING MULTIPLE SURFACE USE ISSUES
...253, 192 P. 694 (Court cites DeWitt language emphasizing concurrent rights of surface and mineral owners); Rennie v. Red Star Oil Co., 1920 OK 202, 78 Okla. 208, 190 P. 391, 392 (Court describes easement in terms of what is necessary for the lessee to develop but further describes the relat......
-
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING MULTIPLE SURFACE USE ISSUES
...253, 192 P. 694 (Court cites DeWitt language emphasizing concurrent rights of surface and mineral owners); Rennie v. Red Star Oil Co., 1920 OK 202, 78 Okla. 208, 190 P. 391, 392 (Court describes easement in terms of what is necessary for the lessee to develop but further describes the relat......