Republic Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. Jaeger
| Decision Date | 17 November 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. B-6155,B-6155 |
| Citation | 551 S.W.2d 30 |
| Parties | REPUBLIC BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. B. L. JAEGER, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Beard & Kultgen, Pat Beard, Waco, for petitioner.
Stephen Perel & Associates, W. Timothy Lewis, Houston, for respondent.
Our Per Curiam opinion of October 13, 1976, is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor:
In 1974, B. L. Jaeger applied for benefits under a disability insurance policy issued to him by Republic Bankers Life Insurance Company. Jaeger contended that he had injured his back while at work and, as a result, was totally and continuously disabled. He claimed that he was entitled to benefits of $300.00 per month for 60 months, the maximum recovery allowed under the policy. When Republic refused to pay, Jaeger brought suit.
After trial but prior to judgment, Jaeger was granted leave to file a trial amendment which alleged for the first time a cause of action based on Republic's repudiation of the policy. The trial court, sitting without a jury, concluded that Republic had repudiated the policy and thus rendered judgment for Jaeger. In his findings of fact the trial judge found that the "present value of all benefits under the contract of insurance is $18,000.00 including unaccrued installments."
Republic appealed to the court of civil appeals, contending that the trial court incorrectly applied the measure of damages for repudiation of an insurance policy. The court of civil appeals affirmed the trial court's award. Republic Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. Jaeger, 537 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.) 1976).
The measure of damages in an action for breach of contract by repudiation is the total of all accrued payments plus interest, plus the present value of all unaccrued payments that the plaintiff would have received if the contract had been performed. Universal Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Sanders, 129 Tex. 344, 102 S.W.2d 405 (1937), citing Pollack v. Pollack, 39 S.W.2d 853 (Tex.Com.App., approved), aff'd on rehearing, 46 S.W.2d 292 (1932). The "present value" is not merely the sum of all future contract payments for which the defendant will be liable. Rather it gives the breaching party the benefit of the earning power of his money. Therefore the proper measure of damages in a case such as this is a sum which, if invested at a reasonable rate of interest, will yield an annual income from both principal and interest, during the policyholder's disability equal to the monthly benefits which Republic would have paid if it had not repudiated the policy. The amount actually awarded will be less than the sum of all future payments...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Crouch v. Crouch
...of repudiation, the present value of all that he would have received had the contract been performed. See Republic Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. Jaeger, 551 S.W.2d 30, 31 (Tex.1976); Pollack v. Pollack, 39 S.W.2d 853, 855 (Tex.Comm'n App.1931, holding approved); Continental Casualty Co. v. ......
-
Howard v. Chris-Craft Corp.
...F.2d 94 (5th Cir.1973) (applying Texas law). The fulfillment of this principle requires an award of interest. Republic Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. Jaeger, 551 S.W.2d 30, 31 (Tex.1976). Although the defendants repudiated the settlement agreement on August 27, 1981, the award of interest in this......
-
Jenkins v. Jenkins
...the present value of all the alimony payments Michael would have made if the contract had been performed. See Republic Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. Jaeger, 551 S.W.2d 30, 31 (Tex.1976). Trial was held on February 5, 1998. The evidence showed that, at that time, Michael owed future payments thro......
-
Hudspeth v. Enter. Life Ins. Co., 01–10–00672–CV.
...value of all unaccrued payments that the plaintiff would have received if the contract had been performed.” Republic Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. Jaeger, 551 S.W.2d 30, 31 (Tex.1976); Group Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Turner, 620 S.W.2d 670, 673 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1981, no writ) (“In Texas, whe......
-
Chapter 11-6 Lost Profit
...future stream of payments to present value in order to account for the time value of money, see Republic Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. Jaeger, 551 S.W.2d 30 (Tex. 1976).[146] See, e.g., Bishop v. Miller, 412 S.W.3d 758, 779 n.32 (tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.).[147] Excerpted from......