Reyburn v. Sawyer
Decision Date | 03 May 1904 |
Citation | 135 N.C. 328,47 S.E. 761 |
Parties | REYBURN . v. SAWYER. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
PUBLIC NUISANCES—OBSTRUCTIONS TO NAVIGATION—PRIVATE REMEDY—PECULIAR INJURY— ACTION FOR DAMAGES — INJUNCTION — GROUNDS—INSOLVENCY OF DEFENDANT.
1. The placing of pound nets in a navigable sound so as to obstruct the channel and interfere with the customary navigation under certain conditions of tide and weather, constitutes a public nuisance.
2. While the ordinary remedy for public nuisance is by indictment, one who has suffered unusual and peculiar damages by the erection of such a nuisance distinct from the grievance common to the public may sue to redress his injury.
3. One who suffers peculiar damages through the erection of a public nuisance is not confined for his remedy to an action for damages, especially where the damages arise from the injury and obstruction to the free use and enjoyment of his property, but may maintain a suit for an injunction.
¶ 3. See Nuisance, vol. 37, Cent. Dig. §§ 164, 117.
4. The insolvency of defendant, so that a recovery would be of no avail and the injury irreparable, furnishes ground for an injunction to abate a nuisance erected by defendant.
5. Plaintiff was the owner of an island in a navigable sound. Defendant erected fish nets across the channel, which was the natural approach to the island, so as, under certain conditions of tide and weather, to obstruct the approach from that direction. There was, however, a reef extending at right angles to the fish nets, which could be crossed by the craft ordinarily in use on the sound under ordinary conditions, so that the obstruction of the channel in general did plaintiff no harm. On one occasion, however, plaintiff's attorney went to the island to see plaintiff on a matter of business, and while he was there a stiff breeze blew up. and continued to blow for two days, and the waves broke over the reef to such an extent that the boatmen would not cross it, and, owing to the difficulty of crossing the reef and the stakes in the channel, they were afraid to venture out, and the attorney could not leave for two days. Held, that this circumstance en titled plaintiff to an injunction restraining defendant from maintaining fish nets in the channel.
Appeal from Superior Court, Dare County; Justice, Judge.
Action by.John E. Reyburn against D. C. Sawyer. From a judgment refusing an injunction, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
Action to restrain by injunction the defendant from maintaining a nuisance, referred to have decided all issues of fact and law. The referee, from the evidence, finds the following facts, to wit:
creek going eastwardly to where it connects with the deep waters of Albemarle Sound this channel is from 5 to 6 feet in depth, and varies from 175 to 600 feet in width. There are shoals in this channel upon which the water is only 4 feet deep.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cameron Lumber Co. v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.
... ... 399, 48 So. 643, 22 L. R ... A., N. S., 345; Smart v. Aroostook Lumber Co., 103 ... Me. 37, 68 A. 527, 14 L. R. A., N. S., 1083; Reyburn v ... Sawyer, 135 N.C. 328, 102 Am. St. 555, 47 S.E. 761, 65 ... L. R. A. 930; Powell v. Springston Lumber Co., 12 ... Idaho 723, 88 P. 97; ... ...
-
Anthony Wilkinson Live Stock Company v. McIlquam
... ... Illinois &c. Canal Co. v. St. Louis, 2 Dill. 70, 12 ... F. Cas. 1199; Steamboat Co. v. R. R. Co., 46 S.C ... 327; 57 Am. St. 688; Reyburn v. Sawyer (N. C.), 135 ... N.C. 328, 47 S.E. 761.) And an injury to be special must ... differ in kind, and not merely in extent and degree, from ... ...
-
Gaither v. Albemarle Hospital
...nuisances. See Farmers' Co-operative Mfg. Co. v. Albemarle & R. R. Co., 117 N.C. 579, 23 S.E. 43, 29 L.R.A. 700; Reyburn v. Sawyer, 135 N.C. 328, 47 S.E. 761, 65 L.R.A. 930; Pedrick v. Raleigh & P.S.R. Co. 143 N.C. 485, 55 S.E. 877, 10 L.R.A., N.S., 554. Compare Broocks v. Muirhead, 223 N.C......
-
Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.
... ... It brings to point the ... observation of Lord Ellenborough in Rex v. Dewsnap, 16 East ... 196, quoted in Reyburn v. Sawyer, 135 N.C. 328, 47 ... S.E. 761, 764, 65 L.R.A. 930, 102 Am.St.Rep. 555: "I did ... not expect that it would have been disputed at this ... ...