Rezac v. State
| Decision Date | 02 December 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 05-85-00937-CR,05-85-00937-CR |
| Citation | 722 S.W.2d 32 |
| Parties | Larry Joe REZAC, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Linda J. Ham, Dallas, for appellant.
Constance M. Maher, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, for appellee.
Before DEVANY, SCALES and HOLLINGSWORTH, JJ.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant the motion for rehearing of the State of Texas and withdraw our former opinion of October 1, 1986. The following is now our opinion.
Larry Joe Rezac was convicted of driving while intoxicated. Punishment was assessed at ninety days' confinement in the Dallas County jail, probated for a term of twenty-four months, and a five-hundred dollar fine. In three points of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in: (1) permitting the jury to hear the audio portion and view the video portion of the recording made of appellant following his arrest, (2) admitting into evidence the results of his intoxilizer test and, (3) refusing to incorporate appellant's requested instruction into the jury charge. We agree with appellant's first point of error. Consequently, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
In appellant's first point of error, he maintains that the trial court erred in permitting the jury to hear and see the videotape because he requested counsel and requested termination of the interview. Appellant contends that the officers refused his request for counsel and continued the interview. The following is reflected on the videotape: appellant was given his Miranda 1 warnings by the arresting officer. Appellant then requested an attorney. This request was repeated throughout the proceeding. The officer then asked Rezac for a breath specimen and warned Rezac of the statutory consequences if he refused. See TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 6701l -5, §§ 1 and 2 (Vernon Supp.1986). Appellant agreed to take the test and again made one of his many requests for an attorney. The officer assured appellant he would not be questioned without an attorney. The intoxilizer test was administered to appellant and this test showed an alcohol level of .159. At no time during the videotaping was appellant interrogated nor did he ever request that any "interview" be terminated.
While Rezac never requested a "termination" of the interview, he did repeatedly express his desire to speak to an attorney. Evidence of Rezac exercising his constitutional right to counsel was placed before the jury to consider at the guilt-innocence stage of the trial. The invocation of constitutional rights such as assistance of counsel may not be relied upon as evidence of guilt. Powell v. State, 660 S.W.2d 842, 845 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1983, no writ). We, therefore, hold that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear the audio portions of the videotape wherein Rezac claimed his constitutional right to an attorney. Id.
Having found error, we must determine whether the error was harmless. In determining whether the error was harmless to Rezac, the test is whether this court can conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the error made no contribution to the conviction or to the punishment. Tex.R.App.P. 81(b)(2).
We cannot say beyond a reasonable doubt that the error made no contribution to the conviction. The evidence showing Rezac repeatedly demanding an attorney is especially harmful because it is quite possible that the jury believed that Rezac's insistence on an attorney indicated his guilt. It is equally likely that the jurors acted upon this belief during their deliberation. Consequently, appellant's first point of error is sustained.
Although we have found reversible error, we will nevertheless address appellant's remaining points of error. In his second point of error appellan...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Lee
...(Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (holding evidence of accused's invocation of right to counsel inadmissible as evidence of guilt); Rezac v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1986) (holding that invocation of constitutional right to counsel may not be relied on as evidence of guilt), rev'd o......
-
Zimmerman v. State
...reversed, holding evidence of Rezac's invocation of his right of counsel was erroneously placed before the jury. Rezac v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1986). We reversed, ... Thus, appellant's objection at trial failed to state the theory relied upon by the Court of Appeals. B......
-
Miffleton v. State
...should be suppressed upon motion of the accused. See e.g. Knox v. State, 722 S.W.2d 793 (Tex.App.--Amarillo, 1987); Recaz v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32 (Tex.App.--Dallas, 1986); Jones v. State, 703 S.W.2d 391 (Tex.App.--Eastland 1986 pet. pending); Gaithright v. State, 698 S.W.2d 260, 261 (Tex.Ap......
-
Dumas v. State
...at 322; Miffleton v. State, 728 S.W.2d 880, 884 (Tex.App.--Austin 1987), aff'd, 777 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Rezac v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 782 S.W.2d 869 Rule 81(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires this Court to......
-
Pre-trial discovery
...Furthermore, defense counsel could ensure exculpatory statements made during the video recording were preserved. In Rezac v. State , 722 S.W.2d 32 (Tex. App. Dallas 1986), however, the Texas Court of Appeals held that the admission into evidence of a videotape showing a defendant repeatedly......
-
Table of cases
...Reynolds v. State 967 S.W.2d 493 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998) aff’d , 4. S.W.3d 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) 3:1080 Rezac v. State 722 S.W.2d 32 (Tex. App—Dallas 1986) rev’d on other grounds , 782 S.W.2d 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) 11:760 Rhoades v. State 934 S.W.2d 113 (Tex. Crim. App.......
-
Offenses against public health, safety, and morals
...could be construed as guilt. Admission of the testimony violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Rezac v. State , 722 S.W.2d 32 (Tex. App.- Dallas 1986), rev’d on other grounds, 782 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990). OFFENSES: PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY & MORALS 11-137 Offenses A......