Rheinlander v. State
| Decision Date | 27 March 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 0190-95,0190-95 |
| Citation | 918 S.W.2d 527 |
| Parties | Fred RHEINLANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Randy T. Leavitt, Austin, for appellant.
Giselle Horton, Assist. CA, Matthew W. Paul, Assist. State's Attorney, Austin, Robert A. Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted on his plea of nolo contendere for driving while intoxicated. The Third Court of Appeals, however, reversed his conviction and remanded the cause for a new trial because the police officer who stopped his car did not believe at the time that appellant was committing any crime but thought instead that appellant might be ill or having mechanical difficulty with his vehicle. The Court of Appeals held that "before a person driving an automobile may be stopped and lawfully detained by an officer, that officer must have specific articulable facts to reasonably suspect that the person stopped is associated with criminal activity." Rheinlander v. State, 888 S.W.2d 917, 918 (Tex.App.--Austin 1994). We granted the State's petition for discretionary review because the lower court's holding raises an important question of law not yet decided by this Court.
Appellant, however, has now died and his attorney has moved this Court to abate his appeal permanently. Under our precedents, the death of an appellant during the pendency of his appeal deprives this Court and the Court of Appeals of jurisdiction. Ryan v. State, 891 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). Accordingly, the motion to abate is granted, the State's petition for discretionary review and the State Prosecuting Attorney's petition for discretionary review are dismissed, and the Austin Court of Appeals is directed to permanently abate the appeal of this cause. Tex.R.Crim.Pro. 9(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wright v. State
...at 358 (citing Rheinlander v. State, 888 S.W.2d 917, 918-19 (Tex. App.-Austin 1994), pet. dism'd, permanently abated, 918 S.W.2d 527, 528 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)). Like the majority, I ultimately conclude that an officer may lawfully stop a vehicle in her capacity as a "community caretaker" ......
-
In re Ryan, No. 10-04-00128-CR (TX 10/20/2004)
... ... MEMORANDUM OPINION ... PER CURIAM ... Charles Larry Ryan seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the State to comply with the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art 51.14 (Vernon 1979) ... The State, the ... ...
-
Cunningham v. State
...direction from the Court of Criminal Appeals); Rheinlander v. State, 888 S.W.2d 917, 920 (Tex.App.--Austin 1994), pet. dism'd, 918 S.W.2d 527 (Tex.Crim.App.1996)(finding community caretaking doctrine to be at odds with the reasonable suspicion of criminal activity The Supreme Court has reco......
-
Wright v. State, 03-97-00231-CR
...Criminal Appeals. See Rheinlander v. State, 888 S.W.2d 917, 918-19 (Tex.App.--Austin 1994), pet. dism'd permanently abated, 918 S.W.2d 527, 528 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). We reaffirm our holding in We note, however, that appellant's detention would not have been lawful even under the Cady "commun......