Rhodes v. Rhodes

Decision Date09 February 1960
Docket NumberNo. 49897,49897
Citation251 Iowa 430,101 N.W.2d 1
PartiesJames Robert RHODES, Sr., Appellant, v. Josephine RHODES and Travelers Insurance Company, Appellees.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

W. Stevenson Glanton and Henry T. McKnight, Des Moines, for appellant.

W. Lawrence Oliver, Des Moines, for appellee, Josephine Rhodes.

GARFIELD, Justice.

This is an equity action for a declaratory judgment that plaintiff James R. Rhodes Sr. is beneficiary of insurance on the life of his deceased brother Ocie T. Rhodes. His widow, defendant Josephine, also claimed to be benerciary. Travelers Insurance Co. paid into court $4500, the amount claimed, and was released from liability. Following trial the estate of insured was declared to be beneficiary and plaintiff has appealed.

The insurance was evidenced by a certificate issued to Ocie, effective January 1, 1954, under group policies covering employees of Solar Aircraft Co. by whom Ocie was then employed. One group policy provided life insurance, proceeds of which are now in controversy. The other policy was of accident and sickness insurance and is not in controversy. Ocie and Josephine were married in June, 1953. A year later Josephine was made beneficiary of the insurance certificate.

The certificate contained this provision regarding change of beneficiary: 'Any Employee * * * may at any time designate a new beneficiary * * * by filing with the Employer a written request for such change on forms satisfactory to the Company, but such change shall become effective only upon receipt of such request at the Main Office of the Employer.' There is no contention Solar's Des Moines office does not meet this description.

Ocie died March 21, 1957. For a long time before then he was seriously ill from cancer. March 4, 1957, he wrote Solar's insurance department in longhand evidently concerning his sickness insurance:

'Somehow my bills are not being paid properly by my wife, during my Illness. She is also signing and cashing my checks which I dont think is proper. Since I am suing for a divorce I wish & hope that your Ins dep't will kindly mail my Ins checks to Mr. James Rhodes 716 Boyd St. D.M. Ia. who is my brother and he will bring them to me. * * *

/s/ Ocie T. Rhodes.'

'D.M.' is an obvious reference to Des Moines. Ocie's petition for divorce was filed March 5 and original notice served on Josephine March 14.

March 11 Ocie wrote Solar's insurance department the letter Exhibit M in longhand,

'I am suing for a Divorce and want my Beneficiary changed from Mrs. Josephine Rhodes to Estate c/o James R. Rhodes Sr or Jr

/s/ Ocie T. Rhodes'

Solar wrote Ocie under date of March 14 (1957), the letter Exhibit L, 'In compliance with the request contained in your letter dated March 11th, 1957, inclosed please find change of beneficiary forms. Please sign your name in the bottom right hand corner and have two witnesses sign in the lower left hand corner. Be sure that the people who witness your signature on these forms are not related to you. After these forms are properly executed return them to the Insurance Department at Solar.

'If you have any question in regard to the foregoing, please feel free to write or call us.'

This letter was signed for Solar by Mr. Rippier, assistant manager industrial relations division, in charge of group insurance for its employees, and was typed by Mrs. Donna Onstot, insurance clerk. The 'Change of Beneficiary Form' (Exhibit J) inclosed in Exhibit L identified the group policies and Ocie's certificate by number and recited, 'Revoking hereby any previous designation which may be inconsistent herewith, I direct that the insurance evidenced by said Certificate * * * be paid * * * James Rhodes, Sr., Brother.'

It satisfactorily appears Exhibit J was signed by Ocie and his signature witnessed by two witnesses. Except for these signatures the blanks in the printed form were filled in typewriting by Solar's insurance clerk Mrs. Onstot. It will be noticed Ocie's letter, Exhibit M, stated he wanted his beneficiary changed to 'Estate c/o James R. Rhodes Sr or Jr.' However, the form, Exhibit J., names 'James Rhodes, Sr., Brother' as beneficiary. Exhibit J was dated in type March 11, 1957, and recited also in type, it was received by Solar March 11. This date is obviously incorrect, since Ocie's letter, Exhibit M, was dated March 11 and Exhibit J was sent to Ocie with Solar's letter to him dated March 14.

Mrs. Onstot, thoroughly disinterested, testified positively that plaintiff brought Exhibit J, signed and witnessed as it now is, to her office at Solar's on or about March 15, just about closing time, and she placed it in the proper file; she was told of Ocie's death, admittedly on March 21, when she arrived at work on March 22; she then prepared Form GL, 'Policyholder's Claim Statement' addressed to Travelers Insurance Co., naming as beneficiary 'James Rhodes, Sr., Brother, 716 Boyd St., Des Moines Iowa.' This claim statement, Exhibit N, is dated '3-22-57,' was signed on that date by 'Onna Onstot, Insurance Clerk' for Solar, the policyholder, was placed by her in Solar's file and a copy sent to Travelers. Mrs. Onstot had custody and control of Solar's insurance files and records. It clearly appears the insurance company left to Solar's insurance department the keeping of these records and matters relating to changes of beneficiary and claims to proceeds.

The trial court's denial of plaintiff's claim seems to be based on his finding that Mrs. Onstot failed to persuade him she actually knew when the change of beneficiary form, Exhibit J., naming plaintiff beneficiary was delivered to her or that this occurred before Ocie died on March 21. The court therefore held Exhibit J was ineffective but Ocie's letter of March 11, Exhibit M, stating he wanted his beneficiary changed 'to Estate c/o James R. Rhodes, Sr or Jr,' received by Solar about that date, must be given...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Kellerhals v. Kallenberger, 50036
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 14, 1960
    ...constituted a nuisance. Although our review is de novo these findings are entitled to weight, as we have so often said. Rhodes v. Rhodes, 251 Iowa ----, 101 N.W.2d 1, 3. Section 657.1, Code 1958, I.C.A., provides: 'Whatever is * * * offensive to the senses, or an obstruction of the free use......
  • Plumb's Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • July 16, 1964
    ...to raise a conflict in the evidence. Roth v. Headlee, supra, 238 Iowa 1340, 1343, 29 N.W.2d 923, 924, and citations; Rhodes v. Rhodes, 251 Iowa 430, 433-434, 101 N.W.2d 1, 3. See also Kellerhals v. Kallenberger, 251 Iowa 974, 982-983, 103 N.W.2d 691, 696, and Reversed and remanded. All Just......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT