Rice's Bakery v. Adkins
| Decision Date | 27 July 1970 |
| Citation | 269 A.2d 215 |
| Parties | RICE'S BAKERY, Employer Below, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Gerald ADKINS, Claimant Below, Appellee, Cross-Appellant. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Delaware |
Appeal from Superior Court in and for New Castle County.
William J. Alsentzer, Jr., Wilmington, for Rice's Bakery.
Joseph T. Walsh, Wilmington, for Gerald Adkins.
This is an appeal by Rice's Bakery, the employer of a claimant under the Workmen's Compensation Law from an order of the Superior Court remanding the claimant's case to the Industrial Accident Board for further findings.
The claimant, Gerald Adkins, was a driver salesman for Rice's Bakery and in the course of his employment received a personal injury. The accident resulted in a prolonged period of difficulty with his back which subsequently required two operations. He received a laminectomy and spinal fusion in 1962, and suffered a second spinal fusion in 1963.
In 1961 claimant entered into an agreement with the employer providing for compensation for total disability. This agreement was approved by the Industrial Accident Board. Compensation was paid from 1961 until February, 1964 in which month a subsequent agreement was entered into between the parties. The second agreement provided compensation for partial disability for a period of 150 weeks. Following the termination of the second agreement for the payment of partial disability, claimant petitioned the Industrial Accident Board for a review on the ground that his incapacity for work had subsequently become permanent and total.
Following a hearing, the Industrial Accident Board held that a preponderance of evidence established that Adkins was still totally disabled. The Board ordered psychiatric treatment to be started at the cost of the employer's insurance carrier, and further provided that the case be reviewed six months after the date of the award to determine the effects of the psychiatric treatment.
The employer appealed to the Superior Court. That court held that there was no evidence of a competent nature in the record to justify a holding of any causal connection between the psychosomatic condition of the claimant's back and the accident suffered by him in the course of his employment. The cause was therefore remanded to the Industrial Accident Board with leave to both parties to produce further evidence upon the causal connection between the industrial accident...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Cephas
...of psychological and neurological disorders when they are the result of an industrial accident. E.g., Rice's Bakery v. Adkins, Del.Supr., 269 A.2d 215, 216-17 (1970) ("The law seems settled that, provided a sufficient causal connection is proved by competent evidence between an industrial a......
-
Ward v. General Motors Corp.
...occupational diseases and compensable ionizing radiation injuries arising out of and in the course of employment. In Rice's Bakery v. Adkins, Del.Supr., 269 A.2d 215 (1970), Chief Justice Wolcott The law seems settled that, provided a sufficient casual connection is proved by competent evid......
- Husband S. v. Wife S.
-
Battista v. Chrysler Corp.
...have clearly recognized the compensability of psychological illnesses when they are preceded by physical injuries, Rice's Bakery v. Adkins, Del.Supr., 269 A.2d 215 (1970); Fiorucci v. C.F. Braun & Co., Del.Super., 173 A.2d 635 (1961), there has been a paucity of decisions addressing the iss......