Rice v. West End Motors, Co., 67338
| Decision Date | 12 September 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 67338,67338 |
| Parties | Marvin L. RICE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WEST END MOTORS, CO., Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Lori R. Koch, Goffstein, Kraus, Sherman & Weinberg, St. Louis, for appellant.
Marvin L. Rice, Belleville, pro se.
West End Motors, Company [West End] appeals judgment for Marvin L. Rice [Rice] on his petition for breach of contract. After a judgment for Rice in small claims court, West End appealed. The trial judge entered a judgment for Rice in the amount of $1250 and costs. West End appeals claiming the court erred in entering a judgment for Rice solely because there was no evidence to support a finding of damages. We reverse.
Rice testified without counsel. He did not file a response brief before this court. Before reaching the merits we are constrained to observe the transcript of proceedings was made from a tape recording system and major portions of questions and answers were "inaudible."
Rice testified he negotiated to purchase an automobile from West End. He arranged a bank loan to pay cash. After the agreement was reached, he requested West End to repair the brakes on the vehicle. During the time when the repairs were to be made, West End sold the vehicle to someone else. There was no evidence Rice had damages by reason of his deposit. His check was uncashed and the funds were returned. There was no evidence Rice incurred any expenses at the bank in connection with his loan, nor any evidence of value on the automobile in relation to the agreed purchase price. Hence, there was no evidence to support finding any loss or damage.
We will sustain a judgment in a court tried case unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, or it erroneously declares or applies the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). To state a cause of action for breach of contract, a plaintiff must allege the following: 1) the existence of an enforceable contract between the parties; 2) mutual obligations arising under the terms of the contract; 3) defendant did not perform; and 4) plaintiff was thereby damaged from the breach. Gilomen v. Southwest Missouri Truck Center, Inc., 737 S.W.2d 499, 500-501 (Mo.App.1987). Damages are an essential element of a cause of action for breach of contract and must be proven. Id. at 501. The mere breach of a contract which causes no loss to p...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
DIGITAL DESIGN v. INFORMATION BUILDERS
...Jury Instructions — Civil; Gilomen v. Southwest Missouri Truck Center, Inc., 737 S.W.2d 499 (Mo.App. 1987); Rice v. West End Motors, Co., 905 S.W.2d 541, 542 (Mo.App.1995)(Damages are an essential element of a claim for breach of contract and must be 24. Digital's damage expert, testified a......
-
US ex rel. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
...of the contract; (3) that the defendant breached the contract; and (4) that she was damaged by the breach. Rice v. West End Motors, Co., 905 S.W.2d 541, 542 (Mo.Ct.App.1995). In the Fourth Amended Complaint, the government alleges the existence of numerous contracts. (Fourth Am.Compl. at ¶¶......
-
Lewis v. Blue Springs Sch. Dist.
...terms of the contract; 3) that defendant did not perform; and 4) plaintiff was thereby damaged from the breach. Rice v. W. End Motors, Co., 905 S.W.2d 541, 542 (Mo. App. 1995). A third-party beneficiary is one who is not privy to a contract or its consideration, but who may nonetheless main......
-
Ronnoco Coffee LLC v. Peoples
...754, 759 (8th Cir. 2009) (under Missouri law “a contract breach that causes no loss to the plaintiff will not support a judgment, ” citing Rice). Because Ronnoco did not prove it damages as a result of Peoples' inducement or attempted inducement of its employees, it fails to establish all o......