Richards v. Manley Driving School, Inc.
Decision Date | 07 March 2006 |
Docket Number | 2004-10572. |
Citation | 27 A.D.3d 443,811 N.Y.S.2d 746,2006 NY Slip Op 01601 |
Parties | BEVERLY RICHARDS, Respondent, v. MANLEY DRIVING SCHOOL, INC., et al., Respondents-Appellants, and JIM SMITH CHEVROLET, INC., et al., Appellants-Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiff by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
While we affirm the order of the Supreme Court, we do so on grounds other than those relied upon by the Supreme Court. Contrary to the Supreme Court's finding, the defendants failed on their separate motions to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955 [1992]).
With respect to that branch of the motion of the defendants Manley Driving School, Inc. (hereinafter Manley), and Jacquelyne Robinson which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability arising out of the instant rear-end collision, those defendants established their prima facie burden on that branch of their motion since they submitted evidence establishing that the vehicle owned by the defendant Jim Smith Chevrolet, Inc., and driven by the defendant Joseph Spero rear-ended the vehicle owned by the defendant Manley, in which the plaintiff was a passenger, while it was either stopped or stopping (see Briceno v Milbry, 16 AD3d 448 [2005]). In opposition, the defendants Jim Smith Chevrolet, Inc., and Joseph Spero established an issue of fact under the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pollard v. Indep. Beauty & Barber Supply Co.
...821, 908 N.Y.S.2d 744; Delayhaye v. Caledonia Limo & Car Serv., Inc., 49 A.D.3d 588, 856 N.Y.S.2d 142; Richards v. Manley Driving School, Inc., 27 A.D.3d 443, 444, 811 N.Y.S.2d 746; Taveras v. Amir, 24 A.D.3d 655, 808 N.Y.S.2d 368; Brodie v. Global Asset Recovery, Inc., 12 A.D.3d 390, 783 N......
-
Goncalves v. Ingram
...to the Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment are distinguishable from the facts of this instant case. In Richards v. Manley Driving Sch., 27 A.D.3d 443 (2nd Dept. 2006), summary judgment was denied. The court in Richards held that the Defendant driver of the rear vehicle created an issue ......
- People v. Raiford, 2004-04889.