Richardson v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 95323-6
| Decision Date | 04 April 2018 |
| Docket Number | No. 95323-6,95323-6 |
| Citation | 414 P.3d 575 (Table),190 Wash.2d 1008 |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | Christine RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. |
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondent's request for attorney fees is also denied.
For the Court.
/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.CHIEF JUSTICE
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Lock v. Am. Family Ins. Co.
...While primarily a discovery case, Richardson v. Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co., 200 Wash. App. 705, 403 P.3d 115 (2017), review denied, 190 Wash.2d 1008, 414 P.3d 575 (2018), is instructive on the issue of whether an attorney’s actions after the filing of a UIM lawsuit are relevant. After being injur......
-
Leahy v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...see RCW 5.60.060(2)(a).2 Richardson v. Gov't Employees Ins. Co., 200 Wash. App. 705, 712, 403 P.3d 115 (2017), review denied, 190 Wash.2d 1008, 414 P.3d 575 (2018).3 CR 26(b)(4).4 Id. 5 Pappas, 114 Wash.2d at 210, 787 P.2d 30.6 CR 26(b)(4).7 Cedell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash., 176 Wash.2d ......
-
Hermanson v. Multi-Care Health Sys., Inc.
...for abuse of discretion. Richardson v. Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co. , 200 Wash. App. 705, 711, 403 P.3d 115 (2017), review denied , 190 Wash.2d 1008, 414 P.3d 575 (2018). A superior court abuses its discretion where the court’s decision was manifestly unreasonable or made for untenable reasons. Ric......
-
Hoff v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Ill.
..., a case decided after the superior court made its ruling here. 200 Wash. App. 705, 403 P.3d 115 (2017), review denied , 190 Wash.2d 1008, 414 P.3d 575 (2018). In addition, under Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Co. , in order to pierce the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product pro......
Request a trial to view additional results