Richardson v. Hart
Decision Date | 12 July 1944 |
Docket Number | No. 6125.,6125. |
Citation | 183 S.W.2d 235 |
Parties | RICHARDSON v. HART. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Rusk County; R. T. Brown, Judge.
Suit by C. R. Hart against Mrs. A. R. Richardson to recover certain fractional interest in the mineral rights. From an adverse judgment, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Storey, Sanders, Sherrill & Armstrong, of Dallas, for appellant.
Clark, Craik, Burns & Weddell, of Fort Worth, for appellee.
This suit, brought by appellee against appellant, involves the construction of a mineral deed conveying a fractional interest in the minerals in and under a 10-acre tract of land in Rusk County. Omitting the field note description, the mineral deed reads:
Trial before the court without a jury resulted in judgment for appellee for 1/128 of all the minerals in and under said 10-acre tract.
It is appellant's contention that under the terms of the mineral deed appellee was entitled to recover only a 1/1024 of the entire mineral estate. Appellant's claim is by inheritance from her deceased father and mother, Mr. and Mrs. W. J. Gamble. Appellee claims through W. A. Mulkey. The proper construction of the mineral deed from Gamble to Mulkey, copied above, constitutes the sole question here. In construing this mineral deed we must determine the true intention of the parties to it as respects the amount of minerals conveyed. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. Weed, 121 Tex. 427, 50 S.W.2d 1080, 85 A.L.R. 391. It is also a rule of construction applicable here that a deed will be construed strongest against the grantor and not against the grantee, "as passing the greatest estate possible." Clemmens v. Kennedy, Tex.Civ.App., 68 S.W.2d 321, 323, writ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Richardson v. Hart
-
Lanehart v. Rabb
...of all the oil and gas produced, saved and marketed from said land under the terms of any lease * * *' The case of Richardson v. Hart, 1945, 143 Tex. 392, 185 S.W.2d 563, 564, involved a mineral deed and interest conveyed was described as 1/16th of 1/8th subject to a lease and the Court hel......
-
Peacock v. Alexander
... ... In Richardson v. Hart, Tex.Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 235, reformed and affirmed by the Supreme Court, 143 Tex. 392, 185 S.W.2d 563, 564, we applied the rule expressed ... ...