Richardson v. State, 39220
| Decision Date | 03 February 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 39220,39220 |
| Citation | 250 Ga. 506,299 S.E.2d 715 |
| Parties | RICHARDSON v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
James A. Elkins, Jr., Columbus, for Norroy Richardson.
William J. Smith, Jr., Dist. Atty., C. Paul Rose, Asst. Dist. Atty., Columbus, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Janice G. Hildonbrand, Staff Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for State.
Norroy Richardson was convicted of the murder of Willie James Turpin and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals, enumerating as error two portions of the trial court's jury charge. We affirm.
In the early morning hours of December 24, 1981, someone broke into appellant's Columbus, Georgia apartment and stole several items, including a television set and some clothes. Appellant was not home at the time. Upon returning at around 4:00 a.m., appellant talked with a neighbor who informed him that Willie Turpin was responsible for the burglary. Appellant testified that at 6:00 a.m. he went to a gun shop and purchased a rifle, ammunition, and a scope, then drove around town "looking for Willie Turpin ... to get my stuff back from him." Appellant found Turpin seated in a car parked in front of the Tap Room, a local bar. According to Richard Holt, who was seated in the car with Turpin, appellant pulled his car parallel to Holt's, stopped, and got out carrying a rifle. He accused Turpin of burglarizing his apartment and demanded that he return the stolen items. Turpin, who was unarmed, denied knowledge of any burglary and he and Holt "bent down" in the front seat of the car. As appellant approached Holt's car, Turpin emerged from the passenger side and struggled with appellant over the rifle. A single rifle blast followed. The bullet entered Turpin's back, passed through his heart, and exited through his chest, killing him instantly. Appellant remained at the scene and was arrested by police some ten minutes later. At the station, appellant gave Detective R.P. Jackson a statement detailing his version of the shooting.
At trial appellant admitted shooting Turpin, but claimed that Turpin's death was an accident caused when the victim suddenly grabbed the barrel of his gun. According to expert testimony, however, the rifle barrel was flush with Turpin's back when the shot was fired. Thus it was impossible, in the expert's opinion, for the victim to have held the gun or struggled with appellant immediately prior to his death. At trial appellant could not explain how the victim was shot in the back during the struggle. He also expressed surprise that the weapon discharged during the struggle, claiming he had not cocked the firing mechanism prior to approaching Holt's car.
1. Based on the record before us, we hold that a rational trier of fact was authorized to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Willie James Turpin. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
2. In his first enumeration of error, appellant contends that the trial judge should have charged the jury to "scan with care" his statement made to Detective Jackson at the police station following the shooting. See OCGA § 24-3-53 (Code Ann. § 38-420). Appellant, however, did not request the court to so charge. We find no error. Joyner v. State, 212 Ga. 269, 271, 91 S.E.2d 607 (1956).
3. Appellant further contends that the trial court erred in failing to give a requested charge on involuntary manslaughter. We disagree.
OCGA § 16-5-3 (Code Ann. § 26-1103) sets forth two types of involuntary manslaughter, each of which concerns the unintentional...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Motes v. State
...150 Ga.App. 831(1), 258 S.E.2d 641 (1979). Compare Rhodes v. State, supra 257 Ga. at 370(6), 359 S.E.2d 670; Richardson v. State, 250 Ga. 506, 507(3), 299 S.E.2d 715 (1983); Raines v. State, 247 Ga. 504, 506(2), 277 S.E.2d 47 (1981); Riley v. State, 181 Ga.App. 667, 353 S.E.2d 598 (1987). A......
-
Bennett v. State
...Williams v. State, supra, 249 Ga. at 8, 287 S.E.2d 31; Washington v. State, 249 Ga. 728(2), 292 S.E.2d 836 (1982); Richardson v. State, 250 Ga. 506(3), 299 S.E.2d 715 (1983); Ward v. State, 252 Ga. 85(1), 311 S.E.2d 449 3. a. In his eighth enumeration of error Bennett contends that the tria......
-
Prater v. State
...appellant "pointed" the pistol at the victim. The second set of facts establish aggravated assault, a felony. See Richardson v. State, 250 Ga. 506(3), 299 S.E.2d 715 (1983). Thus, there was no evidence of record to support this request to charge. See also Smith v. State, 249 Ga. 801(2), 294......
-
Williams v. State, 76306
...support the claim. Ward v. State, 252 Ga. 85 (1), 311 S.E.2d 449; Saylors v. State, 251 Ga. 735 (2), 309 S.E.2d 796; Richardson v. State, 250 Ga. 506 (3), 299 S.E.2d 715. Williams claimed he picked up "cans and boxes." He admitted being parked in front of the loading dock and saw this "box ......