Richardson v. Wellman Combing Co., 17473
Decision Date | 10 November 1958 |
Docket Number | No. 17473,17473 |
Citation | 233 S.C. 454,105 S.E.2d 602 |
Parties | Hazard RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. WELLMAN COMBING COMPANY, Employer, and American Employers Insurance Company, Carrier, Respondents. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
J. Ralph Gasque, William H. Seals, Marion, for appellant.
Royall & Wright, Charles D. Powers, Florence, for respondents.
This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court reversing an award for compensation made by the Industrial Commission. The questions presented are (1) Has the claimant shown that he suffered an injury by accident? (2) If so, did such injury arise out of and in the course of his employment?
The claimant, Hazard Richardson, is approximately 37 years of age. His education did not extend beyond the eighth grade. After a pre-employment physical examination, he commenced working with the Wellman Combing Company of Johnsonville, South Carolina on October 10, 1955. Prior to that time he was engaged in farming and carpentry. His job with the Wellman Combing Company was that of French comb tender, which required him 'to put wool into the combs, keep the combs running, and push the wool from the combs up to the finishers.' This necessitated his standing or walking most of the time.
It is undisputed that claimant had had varicose veins for some time. According to his own witnesses there were 'knots' or 'bulging veins' on each leg below the knee. One of these witnesses estimated the size of these knots to be as 'large as the end of my finger.' Claimant testified that prior to his employment with the Wellman Combing Company, he suffered no pain from this varicose condition and it had not interfered with the use of his legs but some time after entering into this employment, his legs commenced troubling him and 'bothered him worse and worse.' On January 17th he consulted a surgeon in Conway who prescribed an elastic stocking which gave him some temporary relief. He continued working and claims that on or about February 12, 1956, while pursuing his normal course of duties, his legs 'cramped'. He testified that about 4:00 o'clock on the morning of that day, 'the cramp struck me from up in my thighs and on down to the bottom of my feet and I couldn't hardly work my feet.' He stopped working that morning and went again to see his surgeon who concluded that an operation would be necessary, and on February 15th ligated a number of varicose veins in each leg. Claimant was incapacitated for some time and now claims that he can do very little work requiring the use of his legs.
No medical testimony was offered by claimant. The attending surgeon, a witness for employer and carrier, testified that the cause of varicose veins is unknown; that they 'are slowly progressive', that 'sometimes they can go years and years and sometimes they break down fast'; that a person may have large veins and still be able to carry on his work successfully; that ordinarily it would take several years for varicose veins as severe as claimant's to develop; that they 'could not have developed in a few weeks but the symptoms might have'; and that standing increases the pressure in the veins and is an aggravating factor. He further testified:
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
'Commissioner MacMillan: In this particular case, Doctor, is it probable or possible that his employment at the Wellman Combing Company, apparently standing up most of the time on a concrete floor, did that * * * did his employment aggravate or accelerate the breaking down of these veins?
'The Witness: Well, the only thing that I can say about that is that it is possible that it did; and from the history * * * and that is what we have to go by, you know, is the history we get from the patient; and the history was that they had become more symptomatic * * * more symptoms, more painful.'
From the foregoing testimony the hearing Commissioner found that claimant 'had an existing dormant varicose vein condition at the time of his employment with the defendant-employer in October, 1955'; 'that continuous standing and walking on the concrete floor during his work operation resulted in an aggravation of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cross v. Concrete Materials
...v. City of Florence, 221 S.C. 350, 70 S.E.2d 553; Brady v. Sacony of St. Matthews, 232 S.C. 84, 101 S.E.2d 50; Richardson v. Wellman Combing Co., 233 S.C. 454, 105 S.E.2d 602; Annotation, 135 A.L.R. The expert who testified for appellants examined claimant first on Dec. 22, 1958. The accide......
-
Sturkie v. Ballenger Corp.
...did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. This disposition of the case finds support in Richardson v. Wellman Combing Co., 233 S.C. 454, 105 S.E.2d 602 (1958); Burnett v. Appleton Co., 208 S.C. 53, 37 S.E.2d 269 (1946); Radcliffe v. Southern Aviation School, 209 S.C. 411, 40......
-
Fowler v. Abbott Motor Co.
...a 'possibility' is not enough to show that respondent's injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. Richardson v. Wellman Combing Co., 233 S.C. 454, 105 S.E.2d 602. It was stipulated that the claimant 'was on call twenty-four hours each day'. This stipulation is limited to the ......
-
Havird v. Columbia YMCA
...also found that as of October, 1984, Havird knew that standing in his job aggravated his condition. Citing Richardson v. Wellman Combing Company, 233 S.C. 454, 105 S.E.2d 602 (1958), the commission concluded Havird had not proved "injury by The sole question presented for our review is whet......