Ricks v. Ga. S. & P. Ry. Co

Decision Date30 June 1903
Citation118 Ga. 259,45 S.E. 268
PartiesRICKS. v. GEORGIA S. & P. RY. CO.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

CARRIERS—INJURY TO PASSENGER—BOARDING MOVING TRAIN. 1. While it appeared from the testimony introduced by the plaintiff that the defendant railway company was chargeable with a violation of its duty as a common carrier, in that its train was not stopped at the station at which he wished to board it a sufficient length of time to afford him a reasonable opportunity to do so, yet as he confessedly, in order that he might not be left at that station, voluntarily assumed the risk of attempting to get aboard after the train was started, and while it was in motion, the trial court committed no error in granting a nonsuit; he having made no effort to show that the servants of the company were guilty of any misconduct save that of not stopping the train at the station a reasonable length of time.

v 1. See Carriers, vol. 9, Cent. Dig. 1369.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from City Court of Valdosta; W. H. Griffin, Judge.

Action by D. L. Ricks against the Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.

G. A. Whitaker, for plaintiff in error.

John I. Hall, R. C. Jordan, and Crawford & Walker, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Powell v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 15 Septiembre 1921
  • Rome Ry. & Light Co v. Keel
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 24 Febrero 1908
    ...Street Ry. Co., 92 Ga. 494, 17 S. E. 672; Gainesville Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 632, 57 S. E. 1007. In Ricks v. Georgia Southern & Fla. Ry. Co., 118 Ga. 259, 45 S. E. 268, a recovery was denied because the sudden acceleration of the train had begun and was already dangerous when the pl......
  • Rome Ry. & Light Co. v. Keel
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 24 Febrero 1908
    ... ... predicated thereon. Also a sudden acceleration of the speed ... while the passenger is in the act of getting aboard may be ... negligent. White v. Atlanta Consolidated Street Ry ... Co., 92 Ga. 494, 17 S.E. 672; Gainesville Ry. Co. v ... Jackson, 1 Ga.App. 632, 57 S.E. 1007. In Ricks v ... Georgia Southern & Fla. Ry. Co., 118 Ga. 259, 45 S.E ... 268, a recovery was denied because the sudden acceleration of ... the train had begun and was already dangerous when the ... plaintiff tried to catch a car rail, which he missed. In the ... transaction now before us, if safe ... ...
  • Southern Ry. Co. v. Nichols
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 10 Agosto 1910
    ...aboard, but not from any negligence of the company, the latter would not be liable in damages for the injury. Ricks v. Georgia Southern & Florida R. Co., 118 Ga. 259, 45 S.E. 268; Meeks A. & B. Railroad Co., 122 Ga. 266, 50 S.E. 99. However, if it may be inferred from the circumstances that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT