Ridenour v. City of Clarinda
Decision Date | 13 December 1884 |
Parties | RIDENOUR v. CITY OF CLARINDA |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Page Circuit Court.
ACTION for a personal injury received by plaintiff by falling upon a sidewalk, by reason of the same being obstructed by snow and ice, and dangerous to travel, as is alleged. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Clark & Parslow and N. B. Moore, for appellant.
Hepburn & Thummel and W. W. Morsman, for appellee.
The defendant filed a motion for a new trial, one ground of which was the alleged misconduct of one of the jurors who tried the case. The motion was supported by three affidavits, one of which is as follows: The other two affidavits corroborate that of Stillians in part, and in one of them it is stated that, when some one suggested that Pratt was a juror, he (Pratt) said: "Go ahead, boys; I will soon have the case decided;" and then retired.
The plaintiff, in resistance to the motion, filed the affidavit of the juror Pratt, in which he admitted that he was in the drug-store a few minutes, but that he heard no discussion in regard to the case; that when he went into the drug-store he heard Stillians say to some person there present that "Morsman has the judge," or "generally has the judge," and...
To continue reading
Request your trial