Ridolfi v. Williams

Decision Date06 March 2008
Docket Number2999.
Citation853 N.Y.S.2d 56,2008 NY Slip Op 02000,49 A.D.3d 295
PartiesJANE RIDOLFI, Appellant, v. ANNE WILLIAMS et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The record evidence establishes that summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff was injured when she slipped on the bottom step of defendants' exterior staircase during a rainstorm, and fell forward. The subject staircase was equipped with handrails on both sides and plaintiff testified that despite the wet conditions, she did not hold onto the handrail as she descended the stairs, which, according to both parties' experts, had a coefficient of friction above the standard. Regardless of the existence of any alleged building code violation in the configuration of the handrails, such was not a proximate cause of plaintiff's fall, and to find that the presence of an alternative handrail configuration would have prevented the fall would be based on speculation (see Plowden v Stevens Partners, LLC, 45 AD3d 659 [2007]; see also Jenkins v New York City Hous. Auth., 11 AD3d 358, 359-360 [2004]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Oguzahn v. Mount Sinai Hosp. & Mount Sinai Sch. of Med.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 30 Abril 2014
    ...also did not contribute to his fall. Robinson v. 156 Broadway Assoc., LLC, 99 A.D.3d 604, 605 (1st Dep't 2012); Ridolfi v.Williams, 49 A.D.3d 295, 296 (1st Dep't 2006). Yet he testified that as he exited the building door toward the stairs other persons were ascending, who may have impeded ......
  • Rose v. Via Alloro, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 6 Diciembre 2013
    ...v. 156 Broadway Assoc., LLC, 99 A.D.3d 604, 605 (1st Dep't 2 012); Rivera v. Bilynn Realty Corp., 85 A.D.3d 518; Ridolfi v. Williams, 49 A.D.3d 295, 296 (1st Dep't 2008); Sarmiento v. C & E Assoc., 40 A.D.3d 524, 527 (1st Dep't 2007). Plaintiff also claims that the insufficient lighting vio......
  • Iddrisu v. 2440 Webb Ave., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 15 Febrero 2016
    ...a defendant moving for summary judgment has theburden of proving that the violations were not a proximate cause of the accident (see Ridolfi, 49 A.D.3d 295), that the premises complied with the Building Code, or that the Building Code was inapplicable to the property in question (see Pappal......
  • Raghu v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 Abril 2010
    ...plaintiff, inasmuch as her testimony was that she was not using the handrail at the time of the accident ( see Ridolfi v. Williams, 49 A.D.3d 295, 853 N.Y.S.2d 56 [2008] ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT