Riedman Corp. v. Jarosh, 22619

Decision Date30 September 1986
Docket NumberNo. 22619,22619
Citation290 S.C. 252,349 S.E.2d 404
PartiesRIEDMAN CORPORATION, Respondent, v. Iris T. JAROSH, Petitioner. . Heard
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Harvey G. Sanders, Jr., of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Greenville, for petitioner.

G. Ray Harris, Spartanburg, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Riedman Corp. v. Jarosh, 289 S.C. 191, 345 S.E.2d 732 (Ct.App.1986). We grant the writ, dispense with further briefing, and affirm.

Respondent brought this action alleging that petitioner had breached a covenant not to compete contained in an at-will employment contract. The trial court sustained a demurrer on the ground that at-will employment is insufficient consideration to support a covenant not to compete. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the covenant was supported by sufficient consideration.

We now hold that a covenant not to compete may be enforced where the consideration is based solely upon the at-will employment itself. Therefore, the Court of Appeals properly reversed the trial judge on this issue.

The remaining questions posed by the petitioner are without merit. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Nucor Corp. v. Bell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • January 30, 2007
    ...not to compete may be enforced where the consideration is base solely upon the at-will employment itself," Riedman Corporation v. Jarosh, 290 S.C. 252, 349 S.E.2d 404, 404 (S.C.1986); however, "when a covenant is entered into after the inception of employment, separate consideration, in add......
  • Dove Data Prods. v. DeVeaux
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 24, 2008
    ... ... the covenant. Riedman v. Jarosh , 290 S.C. 252, 349 ... S.E.2d 404 (1986). However, when a ... applicable to non-solicitation covenant); Nucor Corp. v ... Bell , 482 F.Supp.2d 714, 730 (D.S.C. 2007) (noting the ... ...
  • Towles v. United Healthcare Corp.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 22, 1999
    ...in reliance on [employer's] promise was sufficient consideration to make the promise legally binding"); Riedman Corp. v. Jarosh, 290 S.C. 252, 253, 349 S.E.2d 404, 405 (1986) (holding at-will employment constitutes sufficient consideration to support a covenant not to compete); see also O'N......
  • Rockford Mfg., Ltd. v. Bennet
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • May 28, 2003
    ...not to compete may be enforced where the consideration is based solely upon the at-will employment itself." Riedman Corporation v. Jarosh, 290 S.C. 252, 349 S.E.2d 404, 404 (1986.) However, "when a covenant is entered into after the inception of employment separate consideration, in additio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT