Riggs v. Saltmarsh, Cleaveland and Gund, DD--313
| Decision Date | 25 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. DD--313,DD--313 |
| Citation | 341 So.2d 818 |
| Parties | Thomas B. RIGGS, Appellant, v. SALTMARSH, CLEAVELAND AND GUND, a partnership, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Roderic G. Magie, of Levin, Warfield, Middlebrooks, Graff, Mabie, Rosenbloum & Magie, Pensacola, for appellant.
G. Miles Davis, of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for appellee.
Appellant Riggs, an accountant, does not want an accounting in a court of equity, but to the contrary seeks damages in a court of law arising out an alleged six-year partnership with his former accounting firm. By this interlocutory appeal, Riggs seeks reversal of an order of the trial court striking his prayer for a jury trial.
Riggs' second amended complaint alleged that on or about February 1, 1969, he became a general partner of defendant-appellee accounting firm, and that, as a general partner, he was entitled to a one-ninth interest in the assets of said firm. Riggs further alleged that on January 31, 1975, he voluntarily terminated and retired from the partnership, and upon his retirement, he was entitled to his interest in the partnership consisting of his share of the profits and surplus over and above his draws as of January 31, 1975, for the preceding fiscal year, and the value of a one-ninth interest in the assets of the firm, plus interest. He demanded a jury trial. 1
Although Riggs attempted to frame his complaint as an action seeking damages, salient allegations reflect that it is a classical case of seeking to establish a fiduciary relationship, i.e., a partnership, 2 and then an accounting in the event he is successful in the first instance. In Manning v. Clark, 3 in which a termination of an alleged partnership and accounting was sought, the Supreme Court stated:
'It is well settled that in suits for an accounting, where the answer does not admit the allegations of the complaint and there is no consent to entry of a decree, the proper practice is for the court to determine the initial question of plaintiff's right to an accounting, and an accounting may then be decreed if the finding is in favor of plaintiff upon the preliminary issue.'
Dairy Queen v. Wood, 4 cited by Riggs, is not applicable for there plaintiff sought to metamorphize a classic law action for breach of contract into an equitable action by incorporating equitable terms in his allegations. Assuming Riggs proves his allegation that he was a general partner, the unravelling of the partnership's affairs spanning a period...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Phillips v. Kaplus
...e.g., Padgett v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association, 378 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1st Dist.Ct.App.1979); Riggs v. Saltmarsh, Cleaveland and Gund, 341 So.2d 818 (Fla. 1st Dist.Ct.App.1977). With regard to the second Ross factor, the remedy sought, we believe a similar conclusion is warranted. ......
-
Scott v. Woods
...N.Y.S.2d 55 (1970) (where sole relief requested was a money judgment, right to a jury trial was stated) and Rizzo v. Saltmarsh, Cleaveland and Gund, 341 So.2d 818 (Fla.App.1977) (although plaintiff sought damages, the claim in effect sought to establish a fiduciary relationship, a partnersh......
-
Parliament Ins. Co. v. Hanson
...of showing a relationship between the parties that requires or permits the ordering of an accounting. See, Riggs v. Saltmarsh, Cleaveland & Gund, 341 So.2d 818 (1 D.C.A.1977). Equity jurisdiction to obtain an accounting in Florida may rest upon the existence of a trust or fiduciary relation......
-
Dahlawi v. Ramlawi
...in equity by the trial court, and not by the jury. See RBC I, Inc. v. AJAR I, Inc., 519 So.2d at 743; Riggs v. Saltmarsh, Cleaveland and Gund, 341 So.2d 818 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As this court has previously noted: "Matters of account are one of the ordinary sources of equity jurisdiction an......
-
Business & commercial cases
...Source Heritage Paper Co. v. Farah , 440 So.2d 389, 391 n.2 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). See Also 1. Riggs v. Saltmarsh, Cleaveland and Gund , 341 So.2d 818, 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (“[A]lthough courts of law have jurisdiction to enforce contract demands which involve an accounting, equity will tak......