Rightmyer v. State, 67599
| Decision Date | 21 February 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 67599,67599 |
| Citation | 108 A.D.2d 1047,486 N.Y.S.2d 99 |
| Parties | Robert R. RIGHTMYER, III, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. Claim |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
McClung, Peters, Simon & Arensberg, Albany (Ellen Hoffer, Albany, of counsel), for appellant.
Francis E. Lehner, Delmar (Frederick H. McGowan, III, Delmar, of counsel), for respondent.
Before MAHONEY, P.J., and KANE, CASEY, WEISS and LEVINE, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims, entered July 25, 1984, which granted the State's motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim.
Claimant seeks to recover damages from the State for personal injuries sustained by him on September 3, 1982 when the automobile he was driving struck a tree off Orchard Street in the Town of Bethlehem, Albany County, while being pursued by a State trooper. The Court of Claims granted the State's motion for summary judgment, concluding that as a matter of law the State trooper's actions did not violate the appropriate standard of care and that, in any event, the trooper's conduct was not a proximate cause of the accident. We agree and are to affirm.
The undisputed facts reveal that the incident began when the trooper observed a vehicle turning onto Delaware Avenue. He noticed that the vehicle's inspection sticker had expired, and when he made eye contact with claimant, the driver, the trooper's suspicions were further aroused. Accordingly, he turned his troop car around and began to follow the vehicle, which immediately turned off onto a side street. As the trooper attempted to follow, he observed the vehicle back up rapidly on another side street and then speed off down yet another street. At this point, the trooper activated the grille lights and siren on the troop car and broadcast over the radio that he was in active pursuit. The trooper observed the vehicle as it passed through a stop sign turning onto Orchard Street, where he lost sight of it. The trooper reduced his speed as he proceeded along Orchard Street, since the road was narrow and had sharp curves. Shortly thereafter, the trooper discovered the demolished vehicle against a tree off Orchard Street. Claimant sustained severe injuries as a result of the accident.
Considering the trooper's action as of the time and under the circumstances in which they occurred, and not by subsequent facts or in retrospect (see Stanton v. State of New York, 29 A.D.2d 612, 613, 285 N.Y.S.2d 964, affd. 26...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Estate of Aten By and Through Kitchens for and on Behalf of Aten v. City of Tucson, 2
... ... 398, 446 P.2d 504 (1968). Arizona no longer follows that view. Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308, 656 P.2d 597 (1982). Another basis for the court's holding in Dent was the fact ... ...
-
Saarinen v. Kerr
...under the circumstances" (Simmen v. State of New York, 55 N.Y.2d 924, 926, 449 N.Y.S.2d 173, 434 N.E.2d 242; Rightmyer v. State of New York, 108 A.D.2d 1047, 486 N.Y.S.2d 99; Zulauf v. State of New York, 119 Misc.2d 135, 462 N.Y.S.2d 560, affd. 110 A.D.2d 1042, 489 N.Y.S.2d 1019; see also, ......
-
Palella by Palella v. State
...was reasonable under all the known circumstances and in accord with the governing standard of care ( see, Rightmyer v. State of New York, 108 A.D.2d 1047, 1048, 486 N.Y.S.2d 99). It was clearly proper for Hall to initiate pursuit of the stolen vehicle and to maintain pursuit given the errat......
-
Kerwin v. Broome County
...is governed by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 and by the departmental training of the police officer (Rightmyer v. State of New York, 108 A.D.2d 1047, 1048, 486 N.Y.S.2d 99; Simmen v. State of New York, 81 A.D.2d 398, 400, 442 N.Y.S.2d 216, affd. 55 N.Y.2d 924, 449 N.Y.S.2d 173, 434 N.E.2d ......