Rigot v. Bucci., 69-39

Decision Date22 July 1970
Docket NumberNo. 69-39,69-39
Citation239 So.2d 29
PartiesRay RIGOT, Appellant, v. Jean F. BUCCI, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Steadman S. Stahl, Jr., of Varon & Stahl, Hollywood, and Dennis I. Holober, Miami, for appellant.

William P. Doyle, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, it is our opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C.J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Rigot v. Bucci
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1971
    ...Fort Lauderdale, for respondent. ADKINS, Justice. We have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (Rigot v. Bucci, 239 So.2d 29), which allegedly conflicts with a prior decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District (Thomas v. Pennsylvania Thresherm......
  • Verich v. Florida State Bd. of Architecture, 69-40
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 29, 1970

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT