Rios v. Wvf-Paramount 545 Property, Llp, 9331.
Decision Date | 23 January 2007 |
Docket Number | 9331. |
Citation | 36 A.D.3d 511,828 N.Y.S.2d 368,2007 NY Slip Op 00396 |
Parties | FELIX RIOS, Respondent, v. WVF-PARAMOUNT 545 PROPERTY, LLP, Defendant, and 745 ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.) |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Plaintiff building engineer was in the process of repairing and replacing electrical wiring in the ceiling of the 12th floor, in order to restore lighting to the entire floor, at the time the ladder he was standing on collapsed. The work he was engaged in was more than simply changing a lightbulb, and constituted "repair[s]" within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) (Piccione v 1165 Park Ave., 258 AD2d 357 [1999], lv dismissed 93 NY2d 957 [1999]).
To continue reading
Request your trial2 cases
-
Caban v. Maria Estela Houses I Associates L.P., 2009 NY Slip Op 30018(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1/6/2009)
...to be a viable precedent in this Department for similarly situated plaintiffs six years later. See Rios v. WVF-Paramount 545 Property, LLP, 36 A.D.3d 511, 828 N.Y.S.2d 368 (1st Dept., 2007). Having concluded that Caban's work was protected activity, this court further finds that plaintiff h......
- Hunt v. State