Ritchey v. Vasquez
| Decision Date | 04 February 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 98-0788,98-0788 |
| Citation | 986 S.W.2d 611,42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 357 |
| Parties | 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 357 Angel RITCHEY and Haggar Apparel Company, Petitioners, v. Dominga VASQUEZ, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Robert D. Allen, Gregory F. Cox, Dallas, for Petitioners.
Aaron Pena, Jr., Miguel Salinas, Edinburg, for Respondent.
Respondent sued petitioners, the district court granted summary judgment for petitioners, the court of appeals reversed and remanded, 973 S.W.2d 406, and petitioner appealed to this Court. Respondent has moved to grant the petition for review and dismiss the cause as moot because she no longer wishes to prosecute this litigation. Petitioners agree that the case is now moot but argue that it should be dismissed with prejudice and the court of appeals' opinion vacated. "[I]t is well established that a dismissal with prejudice functions as a final determination on the merits." Mossler v. Shields, 818 S.W.2d 752, 754 (Tex.1991) (per curiam). But "[d]ismissal for mootness is not a ruling on the merits." Speer v. Presbyterian Children's Home and Serv. Agency, 847 S.W.2d 227, 229 (Tex.1993). It follows that in dismissing the cause as moot we cannot make the dismissal with prejudice.
Petitioners move us to vacate the court of appeals' opinion, but we decline to do so, consistent with our usual procedure. Houston Cable TV, Inc. v. Inwood West Civic Ass'n, 860 S.W.2d 72, 73 (Tex.1993).
Accordingly, petitioners' motion is denied, respondent's motion is granted in part, the petition for review is granted, the judgments of the court of appeals and of the district court are vacated without reference to the merits, and the cause is dismissed as moot.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Dept. of Family & Protective Services
...is well established that a dismissal with prejudice functions as a final determination on the merits."); accord Ritchey v. Vasquez, 986 S.W.2d 611, 612 (Tex. 1999) (per curiam). 17. Crofts v. Court of Civil Appeals for Eighth Supreme Judicial Dist., 362 S.W.2d 101, 104 (Tex. 1962) ("It is e......
-
Sw. Airlines Pilots Ass'n v. The Boeing Co.
... ... operates as an adjudication on the merits as if the case had ... been tried and decided. Ritchey v. Vasquez , 986 ... S.W.2d 611, 612 (Tex. 1999) (per curiam) ... [ 5 ] Instead, Boeing argues that ... SWAPA's claims are ... ...
-
Hamilton v. Pechacek
...the merits” or with prejudice. A dismissal with prejudice operates as if the case had been fully tried and decided. See Ritchey v. Vasquez, 986 S.W.2d 611, 612 (Tex.1999). Orders dismissing cases with prejudice have full res judicata and collateral estoppel effect, barring subsequent reliti......
-
Harris County v. Sykes
...held, however, a dismissal constitutes a final determination on the merits of the matter actually decided. See Ritchey v. Vasquez, 986 S.W.2d 611, 612 (Tex.1999) (per curiam); Mossier v. Shields, 818 S.W.2d 752, 754 (Tex.1991) (per curiam). In this case, there is a final adjudication that t......