Ritchie County Bank v. Firemen's Ins. Co
Decision Date | 15 March 1904 |
Citation | 47 S.E. 94,55 W.Va. 261 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | RITCHIE COUNTY BANK . v. FIREMEN'S INS. CO. |
INSURANCE—ACTION ON POLICY—CHANGE OF TITLE—BREACH OF CONDITIONS—WAIVER.
1. The defendant insurance company, in consideration of $75 premium, by its agent, C, issued and delivered its policy to S. D. W. for $2,500, as follows: $1,500 thereof on a building used for a hotel, office, and other purposes, then owned by S. D. W., and $1,000, the residue, on hotel, office, and kitchen furniture; loss, if any, under the first item of the policy, payable to B., as its interest might appear at the time of fire. The property was totally destroyed by fire. Held, that B. can maintain its action in its own name upon said policy against the company for said $1,500.
2. Where an insurance policy stipulates that the entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed thereon or added thereto, shall be void, _ if any change, other than by the death of the insured, shall take place in the interest, title, or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard), whether by legal process, judgment, or voluntary act of the insured, or otherwise, and the insured, after the policy is issued and delivered to him by the company, without any agreement or consent of the company indorsed on said policy or added thereto, and without the consent of the company in any other way obtained by him, voluntarily conveys by deed the insured property to another, such conveyance and change of title of the insured property forfeits the policy, with the right to recover thereon for loss or damage to the property.
¶ 2. See Insurance, vol. 28, Cent Dig. § 791.
3. S. D. W., after he had received the policy sued on, conveyed the insured property by deed to E. D. W., and E. D. W., after such conveyance to him, made and delivered his notes, payable to C. (who, as the agent of the company, issued the policy to S. D. W.), in payment of the premium expressed in the policy, and afterwards E. D. W. paid the said notes to C, but without the knowledge, consent, or ratification of the company. Held, that the acts of O, in receiving said notes and collecting the same in payment of the said premium, did not constitute a waiver by the company of the forfeiture of said policy as aforesaid.
4. Chapter 33, p. 120, of the Acts of the Legislature of 1899, renders fire insurance companies doing business in this state liable, in case of total loss, by fire or otherwise, as stated in the policy, on any real estate insured by them, for the whole amount of insurance stated in the policy of insurance upon said real estate.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error to Circuit Court, Ritchie County; M. H. Willis, Judge.
Action by the Ritchie County Bank against the Firemen's Insurance Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.
Sherman Robinson and J. Newman, for plaintiff in error.
Young & McWhorter, for defendant in error.
In an action of assumpsit, brought by the Ritchie County Bank against the Firemen's Insurance Company of Baltimore, Md., the circuit court of said county, on the 20th day of February, 1903, rendered a judgment against the plaintiff, dismissing its action and awarding costs to the defendant To this judgment, the plaintiff bank obtained a writ of error and supersedeas. Various rulings of the court, made during the progress of the action, are assigned by petitioner as grounds of error. All of the evidence adduced on the trial is certified in bills of exception. Plaintiff's declaration is in the form proscribed by section 01 of chapter 125 of the Code of 1899. It alleges that the defendant, by virtue of the policy of Insurance thereto attached and therewith filed, owes to the plaintiff the sum of $1,500 for loss in respect to the property insured by said policy, caused by fire on or about the 21st day of December, 1901, at the town of Cairo, in the said county of Ritchie. The policy sued on is in form the "standard fire insurance policy, " bears date on the 8th day of March, 1901, is numbered 709, 500, and, among Its many provisions, contains the following:
Attached to the printed form of the policy is the following: And the "consent by company to assignment of interest":
The defendant interposed a demurrer to the declaration, which was overruled by the court Defendant contends that the policy sued on is indivisible, and, being so, its said demurrer should have been sustained. The policy expressly provides that loss, if any, under the first item (the $1,500 item) of the policy shall be payable to the Ritchie County Bank as its Interest may appear at the time of fire. The declaration avers that the defendant owes to the plaintiff the sum of $1,500 for loss in respect to the property insured by said policy. Under section 62 of said chapter, if good cause therefor be shown or appear, the court or judge in vacation may order the plaintiff to file a more particular statement in any...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Medley v. German Alliance Ins. Co.
...On a question of insurance, I think the decision of the Supreme Court ought to govern. See Ritchie Co. Bank v. Ins. Co. (decided this term) 47 S.E. 94, for views this question. MILLER, J., concurs in this note. ...
-
Fayetteville Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of W.Va.
... ... Error ... to Circuit Court, Monroe County ... Action ... by the Fayetteville Building & Loan ... 904, 75 So. 196; People's Saving Bank v. Retail ... Merchants' Mutual Fire Ass'n, 146 Iowa 536, 123 ... N.W ... Parkersburg Insurance ... Co., 37 W.Va. 789, 17 S.E. 303; Ritchie County Bank ... v. Insurance Co., 55 W.Va. 261, 47 S.E. 94; Bacot v ... ...
-
Cox v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
... ... APPEAL ... from the chancery court of Copiah county HON. V. J. STRICKER, ... Chancellor ... [172 ... Miss. 842] ... A. Cox and J. W. Heap, receiver of the ... People's Bank of Crystal Springs. From a decree for the ... receiver, defendant Cox ... 303; Bentley v. Standard ... Fire Ins. Co., 23 S.E. 584; Ritchie County Bank v ... Fireman's Ins. Co., 47 S.E. 94; Parks et al. v ... ...
-
Nicholas v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.
...has no right to demand arbitration of the amount of the loss, though the policy provides for it". See also Ritchie County Bank v. The Fireman's Insurance Co., 55 W. Va. 261, Pt. 4, syl., 47 S. E. 94; Teter v. Franklin Fire Insurance Co., 74 W. Va. 344, Pt. 2, syl., 82 S. E. 40; Shinn v. Wes......