Rite Rate Cab Co. v. McGee, A-C

Decision Date27 December 1963
Docket NumberNo. 3915,A-C,3915
Citation159 So.2d 663
PartiesRITE RATE CAB COMPANY, Inc., d/b/a Shouppe's Rent-ar Service, and Joseph Francis Reidy, Appellants, v. Bernard A. McGEE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Billy L. Rowe, of Mann, Harrison, Mann & Rowe, and Robert L. Williams of Earle, Hawes & Williams, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Norman Bie, Jr., Clearwater, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal a judgment awarding plaintiff $22,500.00 damages for property damages and personal injuries arising out of an automobile rear-end collision. The plaintiff was a 54 year old man with a life expectancy of approximately 20 years. Liability was conceded and, although there are seven points specified on appeal, we find that essentially the only question presented is whether or not the verdict of the jury was excessive.

The evidence tends to show that the plaintiff sustained a fracture of the fifth lumbar vertebra and muscular tears and ligament strain in the region of the neck and shoulders causing him to hold his head in an abnormal position because of pain. There was competent testimony to the effect that plaintiff's injuries were limiting, permanent and painful and that he gave up a good position with potential because he was unable to keep the pace; that he accepted a selling job with less potential in order to support his family; that this automobile was damaged; that he was required to wear a back brace for an extended period; that he incurred and will continue to incur large medical expenses and that he will undergo pain and suffering in the future. There was testimony that the only treatment for alleviation of plaintiff's back condition would be an operation to fuse the spine 'which would be dangerous and disabling and expensive, and might not be successful. * * *'

A Dr. Roger A. Carlyle testified objectively that from his X-ray examination 'the man has an unhealed fracture which should be disabling and should become worse and worse as time goes on; his disability should become greater as time goes on.' There were some conflicts of medical testimony, but the conflicts were competently resolved below.

As a defendant should not be unjustly mulcted in damages, so a plaintiff should not be denied full compensation when justly entitled to recover and a jury award should be accorded due respect. Tampa Transit Lines v. Smith, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 557. The amount of a verdict,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. v. McKelvey
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 March 1972
    ...v. Magoffin, Fla.1968, 100 So.2d 626; Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Stewart, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 880; Rite Rate Cab Company v. McGee, Fla.App.1963, 159 So.2d 663; Sinclair Refining Co. v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 499; Talcott v. Holl, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 420. No ascer......
  • Talcott v. Holl, 67--765
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 June 1969
    ...v. Shontz, 159 Fla. 518, 32 So.2d 248.' See also, Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring, 146 Fla. 154, 200 So. 376, 378; Rite Rate Cab Company v. McGee, Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 663, 664. The argument presented on this point by the appellants is that because of the size of this verdict it should be con......
  • Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. v. McKelvey
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 22 November 1972
    ...den. 256 So.2d 6 (Fla.1971); Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Stewart, 140 So.2d 880 (Fla.App.3d, 1962); Rite Rate Cab Company v. McGee, 159 So.2d 663 (Fla.App.2d, 1963). The safeguard of proper judicial review has been afforded in this case and the award passes Quite obviously some sp......
  • Washwell, Inc. v. Morejon
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 19 March 1974
    ...Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480; Tampa Transit Lines, Inc. v. Smith, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 557; Rite Rate Cab Company v. McGee, Fla.App.1963, 159 So.2d 663; Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. McKelvey, Fla.App.1972, 259 So.2d 777, aff'd Fla., 270 So.2d In the McKelvey case, jus......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT