Rivera v. Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc.
Decision Date | 02 May 2006 |
Docket Number | 2005-05473.,2005-11150. |
Citation | 817 N.Y.S.2d 293,2006 NY Slip Op 03568,29 A.D.3d 560 |
Parties | MICHAEL RIVERA, Respondent, v. GLEN OAKS VILLAGE OWNERS, INC., Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.
Although the order of the Supreme Court dated August 9, 2005 purported to deny the defendant's motion for leave to reargue, it is clear that the Supreme Court, in effect, granted reargument and adhered to its prior determination (see McNeil v Dixon, 9 AD3d 481, 482 [2004]; McNamara v Rockland County Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn., 302 AD2d 435, 436 [2003]). To the extent that the Supreme Court, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination, the order is appealable by the defendant (see Chase Manhattan Mtge. Corp. v Anatian, 22 AD3d 625, 626-627 [2005]; McNamara v Rockland County Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn., supra).
"A motion is made when a notice of motion is served" (Russo v Eveco Dev. Corp., 256 AD2d 566 [1998], citing CPLR 2211). In accordance with this rule, the defendant's motion for summary judgment was made on October 21, 2004 when it was served, by mail, on the attorney for the plaintiff (see CPLR 2103 [b] [2]; Weinstein-Korn-Miller NY Civil Practice ¶ 2211.07). The service of the motion on October 21, 2004 was timely. The Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, did not permit the filing of this motion, because the return date that had been selected, November 10, 2004, fell on a Wednesday, and was thus inconsistent with a special rule of the I.A.S. Justice that required that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Castillo v. 281 Broadway Assocs., 12984/09.
...( Steisel v. Golden Reef Diner, 67 A.D.3d 670, 670, 888 N.Y.S.2d 150 [2nd Dept 2009]citing Rivera v. Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc., 29 A.D.3d 560, 561, 817 N.Y.S.2d 293 [2nd Dept 2006] ). It is undisputed that the note of issue was filed on October 11, 2016 and that the motion was made on ......
-
Lambert v. Macy's E., Inc.
...“ “made” when the motion is served ( see Perez v. City of New York, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op 51196[U], *1 [2009], citing Rivera v. Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc., 29 A.D.3d 560 [2006];see alsoCPLR 2211). Trial courts have broad discretion to determine whether good cause exists to grant leave to fi......
-
Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Sim
...(see Private Capital Group, LLC v. Llobell, 189 A.D.3d at 1484, 134 N.Y.S.3d 760 ; see also Rivera v. Glen Oaks Vil. Owners, Inc., 29 A.D.3d 560, 561, 817 N.Y.S.2d 293 ). The plaintiff failed to meet its burden of establishing, prima facie, that the subject loan was not a "home loan" as def......
-
Redman v. South Island Orthopaedic Group, P.C.
...Co., 4 N.Y.3d at 817, 796 N.Y.S.2d 573, 829 N.E.2d 665; Ambrosio v. Simonovsky, 62 A.D.3d 634, 878 N.Y.S.2d 191; Riccio v. Ghulam, 29 A.D.3d at 560, 815 N.Y.S.2d 125; Wilkins v. Burgess, 25 A.D.3d at 795, 807 N.Y.S.2d 574; Liaros v. City of New York, 14 A.D.3d 662, 663, 789 N.Y.S.2d 290; Le......