Rivera v. Komor

Decision Date19 January 2010
Docket Number2008-07951
PartiesEFREN RIVERA, Appellant, v. MICHELLE KOMOR et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A party seeking to vacate an order entered upon his or her default is required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious cause of action or defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Nowell v NYU Med. Ctr., 55 AD3d 573 [2008]; Simpson v Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389 [2008]). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the Supreme Court's discretion (see Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 10 AD3d 393, 394 [2004]; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568, 569 [1997]). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to vacate the order dated April 29, 2008, entered upon his default.

SANTUCCI, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Tsoukas v. Tsoukas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 February 2015
    ...The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court (see Rivera v. Komor, 69 A.D.3d 833, 833, 892 N.Y.S.2d 769 ; Antoine v. Bee, 26 A.D.3d 306, 306, 812 N.Y.S.2d 557 ). Under the circumstances presented here, the record supports th......
  • Lane v. Smith
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 3 May 2011
    ...The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court ( see Rivera v. Komor, 69 A.D.3d 833, 833, 892 N.Y.S.2d 769;Star Indus., Inc. v. Innovative Beverages, Inc., 55 A.D.3d at 904, 866 N.Y.S.2d 357;Antoine v. Bee, 26 A.D.3d 306, 306,......
  • McNamara v. McNamara
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 November 2016
    ...at 976, 24 N.Y.S.3d 78 ; Eastern Sav. Bank, FSB v. Charles, 103 A.D.3d 683, 684, 959 N.Y.S.2d 704 ; Rivera v. Komor, 69 A.D.3d 833, 892 N.Y.S.2d 769 ). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 50......
  • Swensen v. MV Transp., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 15 November 2011
    ...v. 1515 Broadway Fee Owner, LLC, 85 A.D.3d 991, 925 N.Y.S.2d 844; Legaretta v. Ekhstor, 74 A.D.3d 899, 902 N.Y.S.2d 375; Rivera v. Komor, 69 A.D.3d 833, 892 N.Y.S.2d 769; Nowell v. NYU Med. Ctr., 55 A.D.3d 573, 865 N.Y.S.2d 309). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lie......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT