Rivers v. State
| Citation | 552 N.Y.S.2d 189,159 A.D.2d 788 |
| Decision Date | 01 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 72350,72350 |
| Parties | Otis RIVERS, Respondent, v. STATE of New York, Appellant. (Claim) |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. (Michael S. Buskus, of counsel), Albany, for appellant.
Kligerman & Friess (Rosemary Carroll, of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Paul W. Van Ryn, Albany, for Prisoners' Legal Services of N.Y., amicus curiae.
Before MAHONEY, P.J., and KANE, MIKOLL, YESAWICH and MERCURE, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered February 6, 1989, upon a decision of the Court of Claims (E. Margolis, J.), 142 Misc.2d 563, 537 N.Y.S.2d 968.
Claimant, an inmate under the control of the Department of Correctional Services (hereinafter DOCS), was awarded damages of $10,000 against the State for personal injuries stemming from malpractice committed by Dr. Joseph Cally, the operating surgeon, who mistakenly operated on claimant for a herniorrhaphy at an incorrect site. *
Claimant's condition was first diagnosed by prison physicians. Claimant signed a consent to a hernia operation on his left side. He was transferred to a nearby hospital for the surgery as the prison had no facilities for surgery. The State did not designate the surgeon although the State's referring doctor knew that Cally generally performed surgeries at the hospital involved.
The issue here is whether the State was properly held responsible for claimant's negligent treatment. The Court of Claims found that the surgeon was negligent in failing to examine claimant and in operating on his right side despite the fact that the left side was obviously herniated and which condition was discernible to the naked eye. The court found that the physician was an independent contractor. The State was found not to be negligent in its duty of care to claimant. There was nothing to indicate to the State that the surgeon was inadequate. The court, proceeding on the theory of a nondelegable duty, found the State nonetheless responsible for claimant's injury on public policy grounds.
It is fundamental law that the State has a duty to provide reasonable and adequate medical care to the inmates of its prisons. Whether the State can be held to be the guarantor of the adequacy of medical services under all circumstances, including those beyond its control, as the decision of the Court of Claims proposes, is to lift prisoners' rights vis-a-vis malpractice beyond the rights afforded to all others. Claimant's status as a prisoner and his impaired ability to make health-related decisions totally on his own hardly justifies such an extreme result in terms of the State's responsibility. We note that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Williams
...196, 198-99, 201 (D.C. 1998) (stating it was not the government's duty to ensure inmates’ safety or well-being); Rivers v. State , 159 A.D.2d 788, 789, 552 N.Y.S.2d 189 (1990) (the State is not the guarantor of adequate medical services beyond its control). ¶29 Finally, this court's disprop......
-
Harrelson v. Dupnik
...to a contract absent some proof that the governmental entity was negligent in hiring that contractor); Rivers v. State, 159 A.D.2d 788, 789, 552 N.Y.S.2d 189 (N.Y.A.D.1990) (rejecting the notion that the state should be a guarantor of the adequacy of medical services beyond its control beca......
-
Kagan v. State
...York, 163 A.D.2d 298, 557 N.Y.S.2d 433, supra; Larkin v. State of New York, 84 A.D.2d 438, 446 N.Y.S.2d 818; cf., Rivers v. State of New York, 159 A.D.2d 788, 552 N.Y.S.2d 189). The dissent points to no controlling authority compelling a finding that the claimant's injuries were not reasona......
-
Herbert v. District of Columbia, 93-CV-407.
...the Court's rejection, in a scenario similar to ours, of the plaintiffs' "non-delegable duty" theory.6 In Rivers v. State, 159 A.D.2d 788, 552 N.Y.S.2d 189 (1990) (Rivers II), a surgeon performed a hernia operation on a prison inmate. The inmate alleged that the surgery had been negligently......
-
Incompetent Jail and Prison Doctors
...Services, WL 426779 (Tenn. App. 1996). 182 THE PRISON JOURNAL / June 2000 Rivers v. State, 537 N.Y.S.2d 968 (Ct. Cl. 1989), rev.d, 552 N.Y.S.2d 189 (A.D. 3 Dept. 1990).Rewald v. San Pedro Peninsula Hospital, 32 Cal. Rptr.2d 411 (Cal. App. 2 Dist. 1994).Roberson v. Warden, WL 383388 (Conn. S......