Rizzi v. Service Development Corp.
Decision Date | 17 January 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 76-2110,76-2110 |
Citation | 354 So.2d 898 |
Parties | Gilda RIZZI, Appellant, v. SERVICE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, and Jack P. Moskos and Betsy B. Moskos, his wife, and Charles Fischofer and Joan Fischofer, his wife, and James F. Redditt and Elizabeth R. Redditt, his wife, jointly and severally, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Hal H. McCaghren, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard W. Bates, Orlando, and J. Geoffrey Pflugner of Dent & Pflugner, Sarasota, for appellees.
Robert Armstrong entered into a written lease for certain lands with the buildings and improvements for a period of fifteen years at an annual rental of $13,800, payable $1,150 per month plus certain percentages of gross sales according to a formulae fixed in the lease with Service Development Corporation. Attached to the lease was a "Guarantee of Lease" signed by the six individual stockholders of the lessee. The full text of the guarantee, 1 omitting the names and witnesses, appears in the footnote. The lease and guarantee were dated February 10, 1969.
In December, 1971, Robert Armstrong sold the property and assigned the lease containing the guarantee and all past due and future rentals to Gilda Rizzi, plaintiff below appellant here. At the time of Rizzi's purchase, rents, taxes and other obligations under the lease were past due. Rizzi brought this action against the lessee corporation and the six stockholder guarantors to recover past due rent and the other obligations alleging that the lessee had abandoned the property, failed to pay rents and other charges, and that Rizzi had re-rented the premises for $800 per month, which was set off against amount due.
As affirmative defenses the guarantors alleged that the assignment of the lease ineffective as an assignment of the guarantee, estoppel by failure to rent promptly after abandonment, failure to mitigate damages and other defenses not pertinent here.
After trial before the court a judgment was entered for the guarantors. The trial court, in its judgment, held:
The assignment of the lease to Rizzi, attached to the original lease and guarantee recited:
"FOR VALUE RECEIVED, we hereby assign to GILDA RIZZI, all of our right, title and interest in this lease, together with all past, present and future rents due under the terms of said lease."
The guarantee was for the benefit of the lessor Armstrong, "his heirs and assigns." (Emphasis supplied.) The guarantee was a part of the original lease and obviously one of the considerations for it. It was not a "special" guaranty as held by the trial court but a general guaranty. It ran to the lessor and his assigns and therefore to any person to whom the principal obligations and the guaranty may be transferred. 2
The transfer of the lease to Rizzi as purchaser of the property and all past, present and future rents was transfer of the original...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ashcraft v. Lookadoo
...(assignment of a principal obligation also operates as an assignment of the guaranty of the obligation); Rizzi v. Service Dev. Corp., 354 So.2d 898, 899 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1978) (transfer of a lease was transfer of the original obligation and operated as an assignment of the guaranty); Hazel ......
-
Sandefur v. RVS Capital, LLC
...law, a guaranty, like a mortgage, follows the note. Greene v. Bursey, 733 So.2d 1111, 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ; Rizzi v. Serv. Dev. Corp., 354 So.2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).2 "The movant shall serve the motion at least 20 days before the time fixed for the hearing, and shall also serve at ......
-
Greene v. Bursey, 98-3138.
...and ran unconditionally to Western World, its successors, and assigns, it was a general guaranty. See Rizzi v. Service Dev. Corp., 354 So.2d 898, 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)(holding a guaranty which was for the benefit of the lessor and "his heirs and assigns" was a general guaranty). Because a......
-
Fast Release Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, 4D02-2790.
...underlying agreement, which operates to the detriment of a guarantor, releases the guarantor from liability. See Rizzi v. Serv. Dev. Corp., 354 So.2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). The majority opinion apparently recognizes this principle but construes it too narrowly in the context of this case.......
-
How to guarantee enforcement of a guaranty agreement.
...Two cases provide insight regarding the language necessary to create a general guaranty. In Rizzi v. Service Development Corp., 354 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), it was held that a guaranty that is part of an original lease and is for the benefit of "lessor, his heirs and assigns" is to b......