Robards v. Lamb

Decision Date31 October 1882
PartiesROBARDS, Executor, Appellant, v. LAMB.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.--HON. JOHN T. REDD, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Thos. H. Bacon for appellant.

Redd & Foreman for respondent.

NORTON, J.

It appears from the record before us in this case that in August, 1872, a suit was pending in the Hannibal court of common pleas contesting the will of Jno. B. Helm, deceased, and that defendant, A. W. Lamb, was duly appointed on the 13th day of August, 1872, by the probate court, administrator pendente lite; that he qualified as such administrator and took upon himself the administration of said estate; that the said suit was finally determined on the 6th day of May, 1874, by the establishing and probating said will and so much of the codicil as appointed Jno. L. RoBards and Joseph J. Johnson executors of the will; that letters testamentary were duly granted to said RoBards and Johnson on the 11th day of May, 1874, that on the 19th day of May, 1874, Lamb, the administrator pendente lite, as well as the said RoBards and Johnson, appeared before the probate court and said Lamb presented his second and final settlement, which, after showing the assets received by him and the disbursements made, left a balance remaining in his hands of $56,136.39.

On the presentation of said settlement the probate court made the following order:

“Now, at this day, it appearing to the court that the suit in this estate growing out of the contest over the will of the decedent has been terminated, the administrator pendente lite makes his final settlement with this court, showing balance in his hands due said estate of $56,136.39, which is ordered to be turned over to the executors of said estate, and on filing in this court the receipt therefor he and his securities to receive their discharge.”

On the same day the order was made, Lamb, the administrator, complied with it and paid over to said RoBards and Johnson the balance found by the court, as evidenced by the following receipt:

We, the undersigned, executors of the estate of John B. Helm, deceased, have this day received from Alfred W. Lamb, late administrator pendente lite of said estate, all the moneys, bonds, notes, coupons, and all other evidences of debt held by him as administrator, as aforesaid, and belonging to said estate, as the same at large and more fully appears in the foregoing eight pages of this his second and final settlement.

May 19th, 1874.

JOHN L. ROBARDS,

JOSEPH J. JOHNSON,

Executors of Estate of J. B. Helm, deceased.

On the same day the following among other proceedings were had, to-wit:

“Now, at this day, Alfred W. Lamb, administrator pendente lite of the estate of John B. Helm, deceased, produces into court the receipt of the executors of the said estate of John B. Helm, for all properties held by him as administrator pendente lite. It is, therefore, now ordered that said administrator be discharged.”

On the 27th day of May, 1874, Jno. L. RoBards, one of the executors, (the other executor, Joseph J. Johnson, refusing to join him,) in the vacation of said court filed an affidavit for an appeal from said settlement, with the clerk of said court, on the 9th day of ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Central States Life Ins. Co. v. Lewin
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 22, 1938
    ... ... jurisdiction. [Johnson v. Johnson Motor Co., 98 ... S.W.2d 146; Cassell et al. v. Fagin et al., 11 Mo ... 207, 47 Am. Dec. 151; RoBards v. Lamb, 76 Mo. 192, ... 194, 195; Aull v. St. Louis Trust Co., 149 Mo. 1, ... 15, 50 S.W. 289; Wolfert v. Reilly, 133 Mo. 463, 34 ... S.W. 847; ... ...
  • In re Estate of Campbell
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 27, 1918
    ... ... State ex rel. v. Moehlenkamp, 133 Mo ... 137; State ex rel. v. Moehlenkamp, 133 Mo. 137 ... State ex rel. v. Imel, 243 Mo. 185; Robards v ... Lamb, 89 Mo. 303; In re Ellmaker's Estate, 4 ... Watts (Pa.), 34-36; Ex parte Worthington, 54 Md. 361; ... Cole v. Woodin, 18 N. J ... ...
  • Lumaghi v. Abt
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1907
    ... ... or so much of it as is favorable to him, and afterwards have ... it reviewed by an appellate court. [RoBards v. Lamb, ... 76 Mo. 192; Noah v. Ins. Co., 78 Mo.App. 370.] This ... judgment was altogether in favor of respondent and the ... settlement of it ... ...
  • Cape Girardeau & thebes Bridge Terminal Railroad Company v. Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1908
    ...of this court, said appeal would have been dismissed by this court upon the evidence of satisfaction being shown to this court. [Robards v. Lamb, 76 Mo. 192.] In that case Norton, speaking for this court, said: "Can a party appeal from a judgment in his favor after having accepted the fruit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT