Robart v. Post-Standard
| Decision Date | 08 January 1981 |
| Docket Number | POST-STANDAR,R |
| Citation | 418 N.E.2d 664,52 N.Y.2d 843,437 N.Y.S.2d 71 |
| Parties | , 418 N.E.2d 664, 6 Media L. Rep. 2375 Hazel ROBART, Appellant, v.espondent. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, 74 A.D.2d 963, 425 N.Y.S.2d 891.
We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff engaged in conduct which was within the sphere of legitimate public concern. Therefore, even though defendant's report of plaintiff's encounter with the authorities was not entirely accurate, no recovery can be had in defamation absent a showing that defendant "acted in a grossly irresponsible manner without due consideration for the standards of information gathering and dissemination ordinarily followed by responsible parties." (Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, 38 N.Y.2d 196, 199, 379 N.Y.S.2d 61, 341 N.E.2d 569.) In our opinion, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate the existence of a question of fact on this issue.
In light of our conclusion that plaintiff is, as a matter of law, unable to recover, it is unnecessary for us to determine whether she was required to plead and prove special damages and whether the "libel" asserted was a libel per se.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. New York Times Co.
...N.E.2d 569 (Ct.App.1975); see also Robart v. Post-Standard, 74 A.D.2d 963, 425 N.Y.S.2d 891 (3d Dept.1980), aff'd, 52 N.Y.2d 843, 437 N.Y.S.2d 71, 418 N.E.2d 664 (Ct.App.1981); Grobe v. Three Village Herald, 69 A.D.2d 175, 420 N.Y.S.2d 3 (2d Dept.1979), aff'd, 49 N.Y.2d 932, 428 N.Y.S.2d 67......
-
Pollnow v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc.
...to the disposition of the charges against such an individual are matters of legitimate public concern (see Robart v. Post-Standard, 52 N.Y.2d 843, 437 N.Y.S.2d 71, 418 N.E.2d 664; Carlucci v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, 88 A.D.2d 608, 450 N.Y.S.2d 54, affd. 57 N.Y.2d 883, 456 N.Y.S.2d 44, 442 ......
-
Lee v. City of Rochester
...shows that the reporter or his editors had reason to doubt the accuracy of Captain Chechak's account. Robart v. Post-Standard, 52 N.Y.2d 843, 845, 437 N.Y.S.2d 71, 418 N.E.2d 664 (1981), affg., 74 A.D.2d 963, 425 N.Y.S.2d 891 (3rd Dept.1980) ("the reporter would have no reason to doubt the ......
-
Ortiz v. Valdescastilla
...the Chapadeau standard, even though the information supplied by the officer turned out to be erroneous. (Robart v. Post-Standard, 52 N.Y.2d 843, 845, 437 N.Y.S.2d 71, 418 N.E.2d 664; Carlucci v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc., 88 A.D.2d 608, 609, 450 N.Y.S.2d 54, aff'd on other grds. 57 N.Y.......