Robbins v. New York City Transit Authority
| Decision Date | 08 November 1984 |
| Citation | 105 A.D.2d 616,481 N.Y.S.2d 349 |
| Parties | Willa ROBBINS et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant, and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Defendant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
S. Di Joseph, New York City, for plaintiffs-respondents.
R. Godosky, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Before SANDLER, J.P., and SILVERMAN, FEIN and KASSAL, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 10, 1983 in favor of the plaintiffs in a personal injury action in the sum of $2,206,556.11, representing a determination of gross damages in the sum of 4 million dollars as reduced by a jury finding of 45% fault on the part of the plaintiff, reversed on the law, without costs, and the case is remanded for a new trial.
On October 7, 1977 at about 6:00 o'clock in the morning, the plaintiff, Willa Robbins, a young woman then employed as an exercise girl at Belmont Racetrack, sustained very severe injuries, including loss of memory, when she was struck by a vehicle driven by a hit-and-run driver proceeding in an easterly direction on Hempstead Turnpike, near the dividing line between Queens County and Nassau County.
In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, the principal witness for the plaintiff was Wayne Hollingshead, then employed as a groom at Belmont Racetrack. Hollingshead testified in substance that he and the plaintiff were two of three passengers on a bus operated by New York City Transit Authority; that the bus, which proceeded in an easterly direction on Hempstead Turnpike, went past the designated bus stop on 225th Street and stopped right at the exit leading to the Cross-Island Parkway, directly across the street from the entrance to the track; that he and the plaintiff got off the bus, and that the driver waved to them to proceed across Hempstead Turnpike in front of the bus in what, it is urged by plaintiff, appeared to be an assurance by the driver that it was safe to do so.
The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,206,556.11 representing a reduction of a finding of damages in the sum of 4 million dollars by the jury's further finding of fault on the part of the plaintiff to the extent of 45%.
Taken as a whole, the evidence introduced was legally sufficient to present an issue of liability for the jury's determination. However, the trial court erred in denying the application of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Williams v. Weatherstone
...[the defendant undertook an “affirmative act of waving her hand to direct the discharged passenger”]; Robbins v. New York City Tr. Auth. , 105 A.D.2d 616, 481 N.Y.S.2d 349 [1st Dept.1984] [bus driver waved passenger to cross the street in front of the bus]; Yau v. New York City Tr. Auth., 1......
-
Williams v. Weatherstone
...[the defendant undertook an “affirmative act of waving her hand to direct the discharged passenger”]; Robbinsv. New York City Tr. Auth., 105 A.D.2d 616, 481 N.Y.S.2d 349 [1st Dept.1984] [bus driver waved passenger to cross the street in front of the bus]; Yau v. New York City Tr. Auth., 10 ......
-
Ohlhausen v. City of N.Y.
...10 A.D.3d 654, 781 N.Y.S.2d 778 [2004], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 701, 790 N.Y.S.2d 647, 824 N.E.2d 48 [2004]; Robbins v. New York City Tr. Auth., 105 A.D.2d 616, 481 N.Y.S.2d 349 [1984]; Riley v. Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1, 15 A.D.2d 303, 305, 223 N.Y.S.2d 389 [1962] ). On appeal......
-
Thrane v. Haney
...child raises a question of fact regarding whether the care executed by defendant was indeed reasonable (see, Robbins v. New York City Tr. Auth., 105 A.D.2d 616, 481 N.Y.S.2d 349; Riley v Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1, supra, at 305, 223 N.Y.S.2d Based upon the child's testimony......