Roberto v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 05 October 1970 |
| Citation | Roberto v. City of New York, 315 N.Y.S.2d 819, 35 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970) |
| Parties | Frank ROBERTO, an infant etc., et al., Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Herbert J. Slater, Brooklyn, for plaintiffs-appellants; Bernard Meyerson, Brooklyn, of counsel.
J. Lee Rankin, New York City, Corporation Counsel, for defendant-respondent; Stanley Buchsbaum, William H. Frappollo, New York City, of counsel.
Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 11, 1969, affirmed, without costs. No opinion.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
Muallem v. City of New York
...plaintiff * * * was violating * * * and was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law." Later, in Roberto v. City of New York, 35 A.D.2d 782, 315 N.Y.S.2d 819 we affirmed without opinion the dismissal of an infant bicyclist's complaint against the city. Thereafter, in Rivera v. C......