Roberto v. City of New York

Decision Date05 October 1970
Citation35 A.D.2d 782,315 N.Y.S.2d 819
PartiesFrank ROBERTO, an infant etc., et al., Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Herbert J. Slater, Brooklyn, for plaintiffs-appellants; Bernard Meyerson, Brooklyn, of counsel.

J. Lee Rankin, New York City, Corporation Counsel, for defendant-respondent; Stanley Buchsbaum, William H. Frappollo, New York City, of counsel.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 11, 1969, affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

CHRIST, P.J., and RABIN, HOPKINS, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Muallem v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Agosto 1981
    ...plaintiff * * * was violating * * * and was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law." Later, in Roberto v. City of New York, 35 A.D.2d 782, 315 N.Y.S.2d 819 we affirmed without opinion the dismissal of an infant bicyclist's complaint against the city. Thereafter, in Rivera v. C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT