Roberts v. Cox

Decision Date29 May 1912
Docket Number16,709
Citation136 N.W. 831,91 Neb. 553
PartiesSAMUEL R. ROBERTS, APPELLEE, v. LAURA S. T. COX, APPELLANT
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

APPEAL from the district court for Scott's Bluff county: HANSOM M. GRIMES, JUDGE. Reversed with directions.

REVERSED.

L. L Raymond, for appellant.

Wright Duffie & Wright, contra.

FAWCETT J. LETTON, J., not sitting.

OPINION

FAWCETT, J.

Plaintiff brought suit in the district court for Scott's Bluff county for the specific performance of a contract of sale from defendant to plaintiff of the southwest quarter of section 7, township 21, range 53, in that county. From a judgment in plaintiff's favor, defendant appeals.

Succinctly stated, the correctness of the judgment depends upon the question whether plaintiff ever unconditionally accepted any offer to sell made by defendant, or defendant ever unconditionally accepted any offer to purchase made by plaintiff.

The negotiations between defendant, who resided in Chicago, and plaintiff, who resided in Scott's Bluff county, were conducted by one John C. Trotter, a real estate agent, who also resided in Scott's Bluff county. Some time about or shortly prior to June 1, 1908, defendant gave Mr. Trotter the following written authorization: "Mr. Trotter is authorized to sell my place adjoining town of Minatare for $ 105 an acre, within six months from June 1st, 1908. 1/2 cash if he can get it, not less than $ 6,000 cash in any case, the remainder at 7% secured by first mortgage on the farm. Mr. Trotter to receive the regular commission of $ 50 on the first thousand and $ 25 on each succeeding thousand dollars of the purchase price. (signed) Laura S. T. Cox." On this memorandum Mr. Trotter indorsed the following: "I hereby accept the selling of the within named place or farm in accordance with the terms within named. (signed) John C. Trotter." Mr. Trotter did not succeed in selling the farm within the six months, and on December 4, 1908, defendant wrote him as follows: "My Dear Mr. Trotter: Ever since I received your letter, have been trying to decide what should be done about this matter. It is like this to me. I feel that I must have the $ 16,000 clear. Perhaps if you show this letter to your buyer, he will realize that you are not trying to deceive him in any way about the commission. If he will pay me $ 16,000 and your regular commission, abstract fees and any other expense of the transfer which may not occur to me, I am rather inclined to let it go, provided he will pay $ 3,000 or $ 4,000 down when he gets deed and possession. I would not feel safe to take less down than $ 3,000. If he will be able to do this by March 1st, the sale can wait till that time. My tenant gets a forfeit from me if I sell under three seasons, and this I will pay. Your client can see that at $ 105 per acre I should get a mere trifle above $ 16,000, but I am not so determined about this that I might not let it go, if other conditions suited." On February 22, 1909, Mr. Trotter not having effected a sale, defendant wrote him as follows: "My Dear Mr. Trotter: Have been thinking some more about the farm deal and decided should your man be of the same mind still that I would write and offer to split the commission and transfer expenses with him, that is, he to pay $ 16,000 for the place, and one-half of your commission, and any other transfer expense. If he will pay down not less than $ 3,000, or as much more as he chooses, and $ 3,000 more in a year from time of sale, he can have any reasonable time on the remainder at 7 per cent. He can have until May 1st to do this, if he wants to do it. But as you know, I'm not anxious at all about selling, so it is all right, if he don't agree to my proposition. I would not take less than $ 3,000 down, and would prefer $ 4,000."

All of the authority conferred upon Mr. Trotter on or prior to April 19, 1909, is contained in the written memorandum and two letters above set out. On the last named date negotiations between plaintiff and Trotter were reduced to writing, as follows: "Minatare, Nebraska, April 19, 1909. This contract and agreement entered into by and between Laura S. T. Cox, party of the first part, and S. R. Roberts, of Scott's Bluff, party of the second part, witnesseth: That for and in consideration of the sum of $ 16,425 to be paid by the said party of the second part, to the said party of the first part in the time and manner hereinafter specified, the said party of the first part has agreed to sell, and convey to the said party of the second part the following described land in Scott's Bluff county, Nebraska, to wit, the southwest one-fourth of section seven, township twenty-one, range fifty-three, less ten acres already sold on north side, but still containing one hundred and sixty acres. And the said party of the second part has agreed to purchase all of the above described land, and to pay for the same the said sum of $ 16,425 in cash, as follows, $ 100 cash in hand at the signing of this contract, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and that $ 2,900 be paid on June first, 1909. And $ 3,000 June first, 1910. Interest at 7% per annum, and $ 10,425 to be paid June 1st, 1914, interest 7 per cent. per annum. And it is further agreed that at the time of payment of $ 2,900 June first, 1909, party of the first part will convey by good and sufficient warranty deed, the above described real estate, consisting of one hundred and sixty acres together with all the improvements belonging to her, thereon, together with four shares of Minatare Mutual Ditch stock. The party of the first part hereby agrees that party of the second part shall have and collect the rent from said premises for the year 1909. And the party of the first part hereby agrees to furnish abstract showing clear title to all of said land, in the said party of the first part at the time of said transfer, and further agreed to give party of the second part possession of said premises March first, 1910. And it is further agreed that the covenants and agreements herein contained shall be binding on the heirs, executors and assigns of the parties hereto. In witness whereof, the said parties have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate and have hereunto set their hands this 19th day of April, 1909. In presence of J. C. Trotter. (signed) S. R. Roberts."

On the same day Mr. Trotter made and delivered to plaintiff a receipt as follows: "April 19, 1909. Received of S. R. Roberts check for $ 100 for payment on land S.W. 1/4 sec. 7-21, as per contract of this date. J. C. Trotter."

On May 9, after having received the proposed contract of April 19 defendant wrote Mr. Trotter as follows: "My Dear Mr. Trotter: Your note and contract for deed came to hand as well as the telegram, but you must have mistaken the sense of the agreement I made to sell quite a little. No one that I know of out there has given more than two shares of water with...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Roberts v. Cox
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • May 29, 1912
    ...91 Neb. 553136 N.W. 831ROBERTSv.COX.No. 16,709.Supreme Court of Nebraska.May 29, [136 N.W. 831]Syllabus by the Court. “To establish an express contract there must be shown what amounts to a definite proposal and an unconditional and absolute acceptance thereof.” Melick v. Kelley, 53 Neb. 50......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT