Roberts v. Johnson

Citation39 P. 596,5 Colo.App. 406
PartiesROBERTS, Sheriff, v. JOHNSON.
Decision Date14 January 1895
CourtCourt of Appeals of Colorado

Appeal from district court, Eagle county.

Replevin by William A. Johnson, purchaser at the trustee's sale under a trust deed executed by the South Park Land & Cattle Company upon certain personal property as security for its bonds, against William T. Roberts, sheriff, who levied upon such property under an attachment. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

This case was tried to the district court on a stipulation which admitted the facts to be as stated, to wit: "It is hereby agreed and stipulated by and between the parties hereto that the following are the facts material to the issues herein: First. On or about September 8, 1887, the South Park Land and Cattle Company, a Colorado corporation filed for record in the office of the county clery of Fremont county, at Canon City, in said county and state aforesaid, a certain instrument in writing (copy of which is hereto annexed, but the authority of the company to execute the same and the resolution of it or its board of directors empowering its president or secretary to execute the same is not admitted by the defendant), whereby it conveyed to one T.M. Harding, as trustee, certain chattel property, including the property herein in dispute, to secure the payment of certain bonds of the company (the authority to give which not being admitted), amounting to sixty thousand dollars, due in ten years after September 1, 1887, and bearing interest, payable semiannually on the first day of March and the first day of September in each year; provided that, upon default either in the payment of the interest on said bonds or any of it, as in said instrument conditioned the holder of any of said bonds, there being sixty of them for one thousand dollars each, might direct the trustee in said instrument or chattel mortgage mentioned to forthwith sell and dispose of said property, or so much thereof as was necessary to pay said bonds, after giving certain notice of the time and place of the said such sale. Second. That one George Westlake was, on or about March first, 1890, the holder of thirteen of said bonds, and the interest due thereon at said date was not paid, nor was it paid at the expiration of ninety days thereafter; upon which said default said Westlake directed said trustee, Harding, to sell and dispose of said property, and apply the proceeds agreeably to the terms of said mortgage. Third. In pursuance of such direction, said trustee proceeded to advertise a sale of said property, according to the provisions of said mortgage, on the 31st day of July, A.D.1890, to take place at Canon City Fremont county, Colorado, on the 7th day of October, 1890 which said sale was adjourned until October 17, 1890, at which time the said property was sold by said trustee, Harding; and W.E. Johnson, plaintiff herein, at such said sale became and was the purchaser of said chattel property. Fourth. On or about August 25, 1890, the said T.M. Harding, as such said trustee, took possession of the home ranch of said company, located in Park county, Colorado, and took such possession as he could by taking possession of the headquarters of the said company, of the personal property included in the said chattel mortgage; the stock therein described being at large upon the public range. He gathered none thereof, and did not reduce the same to actual personal possession. The property herein in dispute was at that time in Eagle county, and no actual possession was then or ever taken of it by said Harding, or the plaintiff herein, until after the commencement of this replevin suit. Also, said Harding, on or about said August 25th, went to the town of Alma, Park county, Colorado, and notified Joshua Mulock, general manager and agent of said company, that he had taken possession of the mortgaged property, as trustee, on account of the aforesaid default in interest payment on said bonds; to which statement said Mulock made no reply. Fifth. The principal office of said company was by its articles of incorporation declared to be at Canon City, Fremont county, Colorado. Sixth. The judgment of $6,252.45, besides costs, in the Park county (Colorado) district court in favor of one Chauncey I. Gumaer, and against said South Park Land and Cattle Company, upon which the execution issued under which defendant herein justifies his levy, includes a claim of $5,650.30 assigned to him by said Joshua Mulock, general manager and agent of said cattle company, which amount said Mulock claimed to be due him from said company for moneys advanced to and services rendered for said the South Park Land and Cattle Company. Seventh. On September 10, 1890, in the district court of Park county, Colorado, one Chauncey I. Gumaer began suit to recover of and from said the South Park Land and Cattle Company, $6,172.94, interest, and costs, and at once caused attachment writs in aid thereof to issue to Park and Eagle counties against the property of said company therein. By virtue of such writ to Eagle county, defendant herein, W.T. Roberts, sheriff of said Eagle county, on or about September 13, 1890, at said county, and not elsewhere, attached and took possession of said property herein in dispute as the property of and belonging to the said the South Park Land and Cattle Company; the same being found in possession of the said company's agent and having been taken therefrom. Afterwards, and on or about October 28, 1890, said Gumaer, in said above action in said Park county district court, recovered, in due form of law, judgment against the said the South Park Land and Cattle Company for the sum of $6,252.45 and costs, and thereupon special execution issued in due form of law upon the aforesaid judgment from the office of the clerk of said Park county district court to defendant herein, as sheriff of said Eagle county, commanding him to sell the stock herein in dispute and theretofore attached by him as aforesaid; and upon defendant proceeding to advertise for sale said property, under said writ, plaintiff herein instituted this replevin suit, and took possession of said property from defendant, and still retains it. Said judgment is now in full force and wholly unsatisfied. Defendant was, when he served said writ, and yet is, sheriff of said Eagle county. Eighth. Actual possession of the particular stock in this suit in dispute was never taken by said trustee, or by plaintiff, at any time prior to the commencement of this suit; no demand for a delivery...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Glass & Bryant Mercantile Co. v. Farmers' State Bank of Ft. Morgan
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Colorado
    • December 27, 1927
    ...... error. . . Arlington. Taylor, of Ft. Morgan, for Farmers' State Bank. . . Johnson. & Robison, of Ft. Morgan, for Epstein and Peyton-Reinert Co. . . ADAMS,. J. . . Plaintiff. in error was an intervener, ...Bank of Ft. Collins v. Shafer, 64 Colo. 388, 172 P. 1, L.R.A. 1918E, 636; Harbison. v. Tufts, 1 Colo.App. 140, 143, 27 P. 1014; Roberts v. Johnson, 5 Colo.App. 406, 39 P. 596; Wile v. Butler, 4. Colo.App. 154, 34 P. 1110; Edinger v. Grace, 8 Colo.App. 21,. 44 P. 855; Lee v. ......
  • Meyer v. Munro
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • March 9, 1903
    ......1014; Lyon v. Council. Bluffs Sav. Bank, 29 F. 566; Aiken v. Pascall,. 19 Or. 493, 24 P. 1039; Wilson v. Voight, 9 Colo. 614, 13 P. 726; Roberts v. Johnson, 5 Colo. App. 406, 39 P. 596; Brasher v. Christophe, 10 Colo. App. 284, 15 P. 408; Rocheleau v. Boyle, 11 Mont. 451, 29. P. 872; Byrd ......
  • Hagerman v. Bates
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Colorado
    • January 14, 1895
  • Lee v. Stanard
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Colorado
    • May 14, 1900
    ...... property, vitiates the mortgage, as to the creditors of the. mortgagor. Wilson v. Voight, 9 Colo. 614, 13 P. 726; Hall v. Johnson, 21 Colo. 414, 42 P. 660; Roberts v. Johnson, 5. Colo.App. 406, 39 P. 596. Each of the mortgages in question. contained a provision that, until ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT