Roberts v. Jones
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Burgess |
| Citation | Roberts v. Jones, 148 Mo. 368, 49 S.W. 985 (Mo. 1899) |
| Decision Date | 21 February 1899 |
| Parties | ROBERTS et al. v. JONES et al. |
Appeal from circuit court, Macon county; Andrew Ellison, Judge.
Proceeding by W. D. Roberts and others for opening a new road. From an order and judgment of the county court establishing the road, and assessing damages to landowners, O. W. Jones and others appealed to the circuit court, which affirmed the judgment, and objectors again appeal. Affirmed.
Dysart & Mitchell, for appellants. Bert D. Nortoni, W. H. Sears, and A. W. Mullins, for respondents.
This is a proceeding begun by the petitioners, W. D. Roberts and others, in the county court of Macon county, for opening a new road in said county. Commissioners were duly appointed by the court to assess damages to the landowners through whose land the road was to run, and who failed to give the right of way. They were ordered to assess the amount of damages to each tract of land separately, together with the name of each person interested therein. They thereafter made their report to the court, which was approved, and the road established. The court, in the order and judgment establishing said road, assessed to the objectors the same damages allowed them by the commissioners. In due time the remonstrators appealed to the circuit court, where the judgment of the county court was in all...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State ex rel. And To Use of Kansas City Light & Power Co. v. Trimble
... ... sufficient showing that the bill was signed by the trial ... judge. R. S. 1919, secs. 1459, 1462; Garth v ... Caldwell, 72 Mo. 622; Roberts v. Jones, 148 Mo ... 368; Cooper v. Maloney, 162 Mo. 684; Reno v ... Fitz Jarrell, 163 Mo. 411; State v. Collins, ... 196 Mo. 87; Harding v ... ...
-
Welliams v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co.
...248 Mo. 494, 154 S. W. 721; State v. Collins, 196 Mo. 87, 93 S. W. 1117; Reno v. Fitz Jarrell, 163 Mo. 411, 63 S. W. 808; Roberts v. Jones, 148 Mo. 368, 49 S. W. 985; State v. Brown, 164 Mo. App. 726, 147 S. W. Finding no error in the record proper, the judgment is affirmed. On Motion for R......
-
Badger Lumber Co. v. Stepp
... ... Glasner, 150 Mo. 426, 52 S.W. 237; Lawson v ... Mills, 150 Mo. 428, 51 S.W. 678; Ricketts v ... Hart, 150 Mo. 64, 51 S.W. 825; and Roberts v ... Jones, 148 Mo. 368, 49 S.W. 985. Neither of said cases ... reach the point here ... The ... statute of this State, ... ...
-
Wank v. Peet
...to the matter and cite Cooper v. Maloney, 162 Mo. 684, 63 S. W. 372; Reno v. Fitz Jarrell, 163 Mo. 411, 63 S. W. 808; Roberts v. Jones, 148 Mo. 368, 49 S. W. 985; State v. Watts, 248 Mo. 494, 496, 154 S. W. 721. When the case was called for argument and submission defendants' counsel stated......