Roberts v. Sarros
Decision Date | 15 February 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 2D04-5578.,2D04-5578. |
Citation | 920 So.2d 193 |
Parties | Annmary K. ROBERTS, Individually and as Successor Trustee of the Trust Agreement of John J. McNeill and Louise M. McNeill, Appellant, v. Kimberly A. SARROS and Michael P. McNeill, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 cases
-
Acheron Portfolio Tr. v. Mukamal
...can be given to it.'” Littell v. L. Firm of Trinkle, Moody, Swanson, Byrd & Colton, 345 Fed.Appx. 415, 420 (11th Cir. 2009) (quoting Sarros, 920 So.2d at 196). “Extrinsic evidence should be considered only if the language used in the document is ambiguous.” Ludwig v. AmSouth Bank of Fla., 6......
-
Newcomer v. Roan, WM–14–007.
...Pounds v. Pounds, 703 So.2d 487, 488 (Fla.App.1997). The meaning applied must not lead to absurd results. Id., citing Roberts v. Sarros, 920 So.2d 193, 196 (Fla.App.2006). {¶ 69} If trust language is unambiguous, the settlors' intent as expressed in the trust controls and the court cannot r......
-
In re Sunshine Jr. Stores, Inc., No. 04-16650.
...conventional trust for the Prepayment Funds. "`The polestar of trust interpretation is the settlor['s] intent.'" Roberts v. Sarros, 920 So.2d 193, 195 (Fla.Dist. Ct.App.2006) (quoting L'Argent v. Barnett Bank, N.A., 730 So.2d 395, 397 (Fla.Dist. Ct.App.1999)). "If the trust language is unam......
-
Ostrow v. Globecast America Inc.
...as a redundancy or surplusage if any meaning, reasonable and consistent with other parts, can be given to it[.]" Roberts v. Sarros, 920 So. 2d 193, 196 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (quoting Singer v. Singer, 706 So. 2d 914, 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citations omitted)) (quotation marks omitted). In en......
Request a trial to view additional results