Robertson v. Puffer Mfg. Co.
Decision Date | 05 February 1917 |
Docket Number | 19434 |
Citation | 73 So. 804,112 Miss. 890 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | ROBERTSON, STATE REVENUE AGENT v. PUFFER MFG. CO |
APPEAL from the circuit court of Hinds county, HON. W. H. POTTER Judge.
Suit between S. V. Robertson, State Revenue Agent, and the Puffer Manufacturing Company. From an adverse judgment, the revenue agent appeals.
The state revenue agent caused certain soda fountains located in Hinds county, Miss., to be assessed for back taxes for a term of years. The notice given by the revenue agent to the assessor directed him to assess said property to the Puffer Manufacturing Company as the owner. The property assessed was held by the McIntyre Drug Company under a contract hereinafter set out, and it was claimed by the appellee that the contract is a conditional sale, and that the property really belongs to the McIntyre Drug Company, and that taxes should be assessed against that company as the owner. It is admitted that no taxes for the years claimed have been paid by any one on this property. The case was submitted to the circuit judge on an agreed statement of facts, and from an adverse decision the revenue agent appeals. The contract executed by the Puffer Manufacturing Company and the McIntyre Drug Company is as follows:
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Jas. R. McDowell and Fred M. West, for appellant.
W. Calvin Wells, for appellee.
This is a suit between the revenue agent and appellee to ascertain to whom should be assessed taxes on a soda water fountain, and from a judgment for appellee, appellant appeals to this court.
The document construed in Puffer Mfg. Co. v Dearman, 97 Miss. 622, 54 So. 310, is essentially...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gully, State Tax Collector v. McClellan
... ... 15 C ... J., Courts, sec. 342, and note 41; Robertson v. Puffer ... Mfg. Co., 112 Miss. 890; Becker v. Bank, 112 ... Miss. 819; Forest, etc., Co ... ...
-
Gully v. First Nat. Bank In Meridian
... ... rated by the bank for the computation of the tax ... Carrier ... Lbr. & Mfg. Co. v. Quitman County, 125 So. 416; ... U. S. v. Philadelphia B. R., 123 U.S. 114, 31 L.Ed ... the bank on the rolls ... Robertson ... v. First National Bank of Greenwood, 115 Miss. 840, 76 So ... 687; First National Bank of ... 212; Williams v. Triche, 31 So ... 926; Cain v. Foote Lbr. Co., 135 So. 769; Puffer ... Mfg. Co. v. Robertson, 75 So. 804, 112 Miss. 890; ... Cannonball v. Grasso, 59 S.W.2d 337 ... ...
-
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Nessossis
...therefrom is manifest and mischievous. Forest Product & Mfg. Co. v. Buckley, 107 Miss. 897, 66 So. 279; Robertson v. Puffer Mfg. Co., 112 Miss. 890, 895, 73 So. 894; N.Y.Life Ins. Co. v. Ware, 157 So. 894. Four well-recognized principles of Mississippi insurance law are involved in this cas......
-
Byers Mach. Co. v. Cobb Bros. Const. Co.
... ... my opinion that under the opinion of the Supreme Court in the ... case of Robertson v. Puffer Mfg. Co., 112 Miss. 890, ... 73 So. 804, that if the machine involved in this ... ...