Robinson v. City and County of Denver
Decision Date | 17 August 2000 |
Docket Number | No. 98CA2566.,98CA2566. |
Citation | 30 P.3d 677 |
Parties | Arthur ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Vititoe v. Rocky Mountain Pavement Maint., Inc.
...(Colo.App.1994), and arguments premised on such errors "will receive no consideration by an appellate court," Robinson v. City & Cnty. of Denver, 30 P.3d 677, 684 (Colo.App.2000). "Although the ‘plain error’ doctrine has been employed in a few civil cases involving instructional error[,] ........
-
Hall v. Frankel
...must be confined to the most compelling cases, especially in civil, as opposed to criminal, litigation. Robinson v. City & County of Denver, 30 P.3d 677, 684 (Colo.App.2000). Here, the calculation of prejudgment interest on a portion of a damages award is not in our view a sufficiently comp......
-
Just in Case Bus. Lighthouse, LLC v. Murray
...implicate a constitutional right. See Wycoff v. Grace Cmty. Church of Assemblies of God, 251 P.3d 1260, 1269 (Colo.App.2010).And unlike in Robinson, the law concerning the economic loss rule was not in flux when this case was tried.¶ 57 Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying th......
-
PEOPLE EX REL. SG
...finding. If there is competent evidence to support the court's finding, we will not disturb it on appeal. See Robinson v. City & County of Denver, 30 P.3d 677 (Colo. App.2000). In a termination of parental rights trial, the sufficiency, probative effect, and weight of the evidence, as well ......
Request a trial to view additional results