Robinson v. City of Perry
Decision Date | 11 February 1913 |
Parties | ROBINSON v. CITY OF PERRY. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
The proviso contained in section 4057, Comp. Laws 1909 (Act March 22, 1909 [[[Laws 1909, c. 39, art. 4]), is an "emergency" measure; and it is not contemplated thereby that a man employed by a city as an engineer at its waterworks plant should recover for extra time over eight hours provided for therein, where the same is devoted by him to performance of his ordinary and usual duties.
Error from Noble County Court; L. B. Robinson, Judge.
Action by Harry M. Robinson against the City of Perry. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.
George G. Graham, of Norman, for plaintiff in error.
Chas R. Bostick, of Perry, for defendant in error.
This case presents error from the county court of Noble county. From the petition and evidence it appears plaintiff in error was employed as an engineer at the waterworks plant of the city of Perry, his service beginning on the 1st day of June 1910; that during the period of his said employment, by reason of the fact that no one was provided to relieve him he was compelled to remain and render service for twelve hours each day, instead of eight hours, as provided for by section 4057, Comp.
Laws 1909 (Act March 22, 1909 [Laws 1909, c. 39, art. 4]); that on leaving the employ of the city he presented his verified claim to the city council for the amount due him for the time served in excess of eight hours per day, which was by the council rejected, and recovery was denied in an action therefor in the county court. The case has been prosecuted to this court to secure a review of the judgment rendered.
The statutes involved (sections 4057, 4058, Comp. Laws 1909) read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial