Robinson v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. of State, & Football Nw., LLC

Citation181 Wash.App. 415,326 P.3d 744
Decision Date27 May 2014
Docket NumberNo. 69739–1–I.,69739–1–I.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
PartiesCourtney ROBINSON, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES of the State of Washington, and Football Northwest, LLC, Respondents.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

William D. Hochberg, Attorney at Law, Edmonds, WA, for Appellant.

Jessica Lynn Creighton, Washington State Attorney General's Office, Craig Koji Connors, Bauer Moynihan & Johnson LLP, Seattle, WA, Annika Michelle Scharosch, Washington State Attorney General's Office, Spokane, WA, for Respondents.

SCHINDLER, J.

¶ 1 For purposes of the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW (IIA), an employment relationship exists only where (1) the employer has the right to control the employee's physical conduct in the performance of his duties and (2) there is mutual consent to an employment relationship. Because substantial evidence supports the determination that Courtney Robinson was not an employee of the Seattle Seahawks when he injured his knee during an off-season minicamp tryout as a free agent, we conclude Robinson was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits under the IIA, and affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2 Courtney Robinson attended the University of Massachusetts on a football scholarship and played defensive back and kick returner. Robinson participated in the 2009 draft but was not selected by any of the 32 National Football League (NFL) teams.

¶ 3 In April 2009, the Philadelphia Eagles entered into negotiations with Robinson, resulting in the execution of an NFL player contract. In August 2009, the Eagles released Robinson from his contract. As a free agent, Robinson could enter into an NFL contract with other teams. In October 2009, Robinson tried out as a free agent with two other NFL teams, the Cincinnati Bengals and the Detroit Lions, but “was not signed” by either team.

¶ 4 In February 2010, sports agent and attorney Lyle Masnikoff began representing Robinson. In an effort to try and get Robinson “an opportunity” to sign an NFL contract, Masnikoff contacted a number of NFL team general managers.

¶ 5 The Seattle Seahawks invited Robinson and 15 other free agents to attend a three-day minicamp tryout from April 13 to 15. On April 7, Masnikoff sent an e-mail to the Seahawks confirming the invitation to try out at the minicamp and describing Robinson's accomplishments. The Seahawks made the travel arrangements for Robinson to fly from Connecticut to Seattle to attend the minicamp.

¶ 6 Seattle Seahawks Vice President of Football Administration John Idzik testified that the Seahawks held three minicamps in 2010. Idzik described a tryout as an opportunity “to bring the player in, meet the player, talk to him, give him a physical exam, ... run him through the paces and witness his movement firsthand.” Idzik said players invited to a tryout are not “required to show up[.] There's nothing mandatory. It's purely voluntary on the part of the player.” Idzik testified that prior to signing a player to an NFL contract, the team can “ask them to go through a tryout, through drills. But if the player does not desire to do any of that, he does not have to. We can't mandate it. The only players that we can govern, with mandatory rules and discipline, would be players under contract.”

¶ 7 Idzik testified that the NFL rules prohibit the use of pads and contact drills during a minicamp, and the NFL monitors the “tempo” of the minicamps, “such that player safety is always kept in mind.” Idzik said drills during a minicamp are “significantly different” than a training camp practice or a game. Idzik testified, in pertinent part:

So the type of drills that we're able to do in mini-camp versus the type of drills that you're able to do in a full-pads practice during training camp or the type of activities a player goes through on game day in live competition are significantly different.

Q Okay. And this April 2010 was a mini-camp versus a training camp?

A It was a mini-camp, yes.

Q Okay. That means nobody was wearing pads?

A We were allowed to wear helmets.

But we were not allowed to wear shoulder pads or any of the customary pads that you see on game day.

By—by [collective bargaining agreement] rules, they're allowed to wear elbow pads and knee pads and helmets. But they are not allowed to wear anything else. And we're not allowed to have live contact.

¶ 8 Robinson arrived in Seattle on April 12. The Seahawks arranged transportation to the hotel and gave Robinson an itinerary for the three-day minicamp. The itinerary included orientation, meetings, workouts, drills, and meals at the Seahawks practice facility in Renton. NFL rules prohibit teams from compensating tryout players but permit payment of travel and hotel expenses and meals. By contrast, Seahawks players under contract who participate in a minicamp are entitled to a per diem. Idzik testified that the Seahawks players who attended the minicamp received a pro rata portion of either $825 per week if they were a “rookie” or $1,000 per week if they were a veteran player.

¶ 9 Idzik said that at the beginning of orientation for a minicamp tryout, the Seahawks go over the “Free Agent Tryout Waiver and Release of Liability” with the free agent players. The Free Agent Tryout Waiver and Release of Liability states that the free agent is “not an employee of the Seattle Seahawks,” and the player agrees to release the Seahawks, its employees, as well as the NFL from any liability for injury. Idzik testified, in pertinent part:

Well, the first thing we do, with all of our tryouts coming to the Seahawks, is make them understand that we-we have them sign a waiver of liability so they understand they're not an employee of the Seahawks, that we're granting them a tryout, that during the tryout they're in essence waiving liability of the Seahawks if anything were to happen to them during the tryout.

And—you know, and we explain that verbally, too. So wewe give them the form and then run through—run through, you know, the—basically the—what the form says.

And—and then at that point, if they're willing to go on, which most all of them are, we conduct the interviews, and we conduct the physical examinations and—and eventually the tryout.

¶ 10 Robinson signed the Free Agent Tryout Waiver and Release of Liability on April 12.1 Later that afternoon, a Seahawks team doctor examined Robinson. After passing the physical examination, Robinson attended a meeting at the practice facility with other free agents, players under contract, and the coaches. Afterwards, Robinson met with Seahawks defensive coordinator Paul Bradley.

¶ 11 The next day, Robinson returned to the Seahawks facility for breakfast followed by a meeting with other free agents, players under contract, and the coaches.

¶ 12 The coaches conducted on-field drills after lunch. Seahawks Head Coach Pete Carroll lined up the defensive back players. Robinson testified that after signaling to him “to go,” Coach Carroll threw him the ball. Robinson testified that while he “was back peddling, my foot got caught in the ground, or whatnot, but as I dove for the ball I was injured, you know, on that current play.” Robinson said he “knew something was wrong because the knee started ... swelling up.” The team trainer examined Robinson and told him “it wasn't a torn ACL [ (anterior cruciate ligament) ], but torn meniscus.” Robinson got ice for his knee and went to a meeting for defensive backs, followed by dinner at the training facility. During dinner, a Seahawks employee told Robinson he was booked on a return flight home that night.

¶ 13 On June 7, Robinson filed an application for benefits with the State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries (Department). Robinson asserted that on April 13 he sustained an industrial injury during the course of employment with the Seahawks. The Department denied the claim. Robinson filed an appeal with the State of Washington Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (BIIA).

¶ 14 Robinson, his sport agent Masnikoff, and Seahawks defensive coordinator Bradley testified during the two-day hearing before the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals judge (IAJ). The IAJ also admitted into evidence the deposition testimony of Seahawks Vice President of Football Administration John Idzik, the Free Agent Tryout Waiver and Release of Liability Robinson signed, and a standard NFL player contract. The parties stipulated that the Seahawks paid Robinson's travel expenses in the amount of $1,124.80 for airfare, and hotel expenses for two nights at the Sheraton Hotel in the amount of $180.76.

¶ 15 Robinson testified that the invitation to attend the Seahawks minicamp was an opportunity to “show [his] skills to the Seahawks” and “reestablish” himself. Robinson said that he was “hoping to sign [a] contract at the end of the mini camp.” Robinson testified that playing as a defensive back and kick returner “is very problematic to injuries.”

¶ 16 Sports agent Masnikoff testified that Robinson was a free agent when he attended the minicamp, that NFL player contracts must be in writing, and that Robinson did not have a written contract with the Seahawks. Masnikoff admitted that free agent players invited to a minicamp tryout are not “guaranteed a position with the team,” and the percentage of players offered a contract is well below 50 percent.

¶ 17 Seahawks defensive coordinator Paul Bradley testified that he did not have the authority to sign free agent players to the team. Bradley said that he makes a point of telling free agent tryout players that there are “no guarantees but ... you have a chance to come in and compete.... You have a chance to show your skills and talents, and what you have.” Bradley testified that the Seahawks did not have a special or “out of the ordinary” need for a defensive back in 2010.

¶ 18 Idzik testified that his responsibilities included drafting contracts and signing players. Idzik said that when the Seahawks invite a free agent player to a tryout, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 17, 2016
    ...burden of proving that he is entitled to benefits), review denied, 181 Wash.2d 1023, 339 P.3d 635 (2014) ; Robinson v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 181 Wash.App. 415, 426, 326 P.3d 744 (workers' compensation claimant bears the burden of establishing eligibility for benefits), review denied, 337......
  • Gomez v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. of Wash.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 27, 2020
    ...proving their injuries occurred in the course of employment. Id. at 200-02, 378 P.3d 139 ; see, e.g., Robinson v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 181 Wash. App. 415, 424-26, 326 P.3d 744 (2014) ; Knight, 181 Wash. App. at 802, 321 P.3d 1275 ; Superior Asphalt & Concrete Co. v. Dep't of Labor & Ind......
  • Osborn v. Department of Labor & Industries of State
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 28, 2015
    ... ... Dep't of Labor & ... Indus., 151 Wn.App. 174, 179, 210 P.3d 355 (2009). Under ... asserted." Robinson v. Dep't of Labor & ... Indus., 181 Wn.App. 415, 425, ... ...
  • Osborn v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. of State, 45828-4-II
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 28, 2015
    ...is evidence sufficient to persuade a fair-minded, rational person of the truth of the matter asserted." Robinson v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 181 Wn. App. 415, 425, 326 P.3d 744, review denied, ___ Wn.2d ___, 337 P.3d 325 (2014). In carrying out this review, we view the record in the light m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT