Robinson v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co., 17570
| Decision Date | 01 September 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 17570,17570 |
| Parties | Alonzo ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and Manie Lee Williams, Administratrix of the Estate of Inez Williams, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Williams & Parler, James H. Howey, Lancaster, for appellant.
Nelson, Mullins & Grier, Columbia, for respondent.
We agree with the trial Judge in his holding that under the circumstances of this case there was no liability under the policy for which plaintiff could recover from Georgia Casualty and Surety Company. Let the Decree be reported as the Order of this Court.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
17 cases
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MFA Mut. Ins. Co.
...Co., Mo., 409 S.W.2d 97.11 Hopkins v. Martinez, 73 N.M. 275, 387 P.2d 852, 855(6); and cases there cited; Robinson v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co., 235 S.C. 178, 110 S.E.2d 255, 261; 45 C.J.S. Insurance § 829, at p. 888; 12 Couch on Insurance 2d § 45:187, p. 237; 7 Appleman, Insurance Law ......
-
Pennell v. Foster
...The terms of the policy govern the scope of the coverage, unless in conflict with statutory requirements. Robinson v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co., 235 S.C. 178, 110 S.E.2d 255 (1959) (although having an insurable interest is generally recognized as a prerequisite to recovery under a polic......
-
Hopkins v. Martinez
...the policy provision. It follows that such vehicle is not automatically covered by the omnibus clause. See Robinson v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co., 235 S.C. 178, 110 S.E.2d 255; compare American Indemnity Co. v. Davis (5th Cir.1958) 260 F.2d Attention is called to the requirement that: 'T......
-
Lofquist v. Allstate Ins. Co., 739
......227, 74 S.E.2d 610, supra; Robinson...227, 74 S.E.2d 610, supra; Robinson v.Georgia......
Request a trial to view additional results