Robinson v. Henry Ford Health Systems, 94-CV-71584-DT.
Decision Date | 30 December 1994 |
Docket Number | No. 94-CV-71584-DT.,94-CV-71584-DT. |
Citation | 892 F. Supp. 176 |
Parties | Jimmie ROBINSON, in his capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Laverne Robinson, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan |
Fatima Hassan Salam, Detroit, MI, for plaintiff.
Richard DeNardis, Detroit, MI, for defendant.
This five-count handicap discrimination/medical malpractice wrongful death action is presently before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. In addition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant has filed a Motion to bar Plaintiff from calling witnesses at trial because of the failure to submit witness lists as required under the Court's Scheduling Order.
Plaintiff has responded to both of Defendant's Motions to which responses, Defendant has replied. Plaintiff also has filed a Motion to voluntarily dismiss his two federal claims and to remand the state law claims to Wayne County Circuit Court.
Having reviewed and considered the parties' respective motions and the briefs and exhibits submitted in support and in opposition to the motions, and the Court finding that oral arguments are unnecessary and that the matter can be decided on the briefs, the Court is now prepared to rule on these matters. This Opinion and Order sets forth that ruling.
This case arises out of the treatment of Plaintiff's decedent, Laverne Robinson, in the emergency room of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit.
On November 20, 1993, 45-year-old Laverne Robinson was brought into the Henry Ford Hospital emergency room by the Detroit Fire Department's EMS ambulance at 4:45 p.m. She had been experiencing shortness of breath and possible seizure activity.
Upon arriving at the hospital, Ms. Robinson's condition was stable. She was oriented to identity, time and place, and said she generally was fine except for a dry throat. Her medical history was taken by the emergency room staff. While giving her medical history, Ms. Robinson advised that she had previously been tested positive for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), the virus which causes AIDS.
While Ms. Robinson was in the emergency room, she had one shortness of breath episode which included some dizziness and headache, which lasted approximately ten minutes. Upon examination, she was diagnosed as having an upper respiratory infection. Blood tests were run which showed virtually normal levels. A chest x-ray was also taken which showed no apparent problems.
Ms. Robinson spent approximately eleven hours in the emergency room. During that time, she was monitored continuously. Her temperature, pulse, respiration rate and blood pressure were taken three times. After remaining stable for several hours, she discharged at 4:05 a.m. on November 21st with a prescription for antibiotics and directions to see her regular doctor as soon as possible.
On November 22, 1993, at 7:30 a.m., Ms. Robinson was brought back to the emergency room in full cardiopulmonary arrest. Efforts to revive her were not successful and she was pronounced dead at 8:55 a.m.
Six months after she died, Jimmie Robinson, acting in his capacity as personal representative for Laverne's estate, initiated the instant action in Wayne County Circuit Court. Defendant subsequently removed the case to this Court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction.
In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges three counts of discrimination (Counts I, II and V), one count of negligence/medical malpractice (Count III) and one count of violation of the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd (Count IV).
With respect to the discrimination claims, Plaintiff alleges that Henry Ford Hospital violated the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act, M.C.L.A. § 37.1103(b) (Count I), the Detroit City Ordinance prohibiting AIDS discrimination, Ordinance No. 33-88 (Count II), and the federal Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (Count III). In each of these counts, Plaintiff claims that the hospital denied Laverne Robinson appropriate medical care because she was HIV positive.
In Plaintiff's negligence/medical malpractice claim (Count III) and in his EMTALA claim (Count IV), Plaintiff alleges that Ms. Robinson received inadequate an inappropriate treatment in the Hospital's emergency room.
Defendant now seeks entry of summary judgment in its favor arguing that for each Count in his Complaint, Plaintiff has failed to make out the elements of a legally cognizable claim.
A. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Summary judgment is proper "`if the pleadings, depositions, answer to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'" Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).
Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322, 106 S.Ct. at 2552.
After reviewing the above trilogy, the Sixth Circuit established a series of principles to be applied to motions for summary judgment. They are summarized as follows:
Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472, 1479-80 (6th Cir.1989).
The Court will decide Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by application of the foregoing standards.
As indicated above, Plaintiff alleges that Laverne Robinson was denied adequate medical treatment at Henry Ford Hospital because she was HIV positive in violation of (1) the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act, (2) the federal Rehabilitation Act, and (3) Detroit City Ordinance No. 33-88.
The Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act provides:
M.C.L. § 37.1102.
The federal Rehabilitation Act provides, in pertinent part:
29 U.S.C. § 794(a) and (b).
Individuals who have tested positive for AIDS or the AIDS-related HIV virus are covered as handicapped or disabled individuals under both the Michigan and the federal acts. Sanchez v. Lagoudakis, 440 Mich. 496, 486 N.W.2d 657 (1992); Toney v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 838 F.Supp. 201 (E.D.Pa. 1993); Glanz v. Vernick, 750 F.Supp. 39 (D.Mass.1990); Casey v. Lewis, 773 F.Supp. 1365 (D.Ariz.1991); Doe v. District of Columbia, 796 F.Supp. 559 (D.D.C.1992).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Great Northern Nekoosa v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.
... ... : causing mental distress and worries about health effects, making them nauseous, subjecting them to ... maintained the waterworks and wastewater systems for a municipal utility district. Several ... ...
-
Abbott v. Bragdon
...*1 (S.D.Tex.1995); Austin v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 876 F.Supp. 1437, 1465 (E.D.Pa.1995); Robinson v. Henry Ford Health Systems, 892 F.Supp. 176, 180 (E.D.Mich.1994); Howe v. Hull, 873 F.Supp. 72, 78 (N.D.Ohio 1994); Doe v. Kohn Nast & Graf, P.C., 862 F.Supp. 1310, 1318-20 ......
-
Hamlyn v. Rock Island County Metro. Mass Transit, 97-4015.
...infected with HIV virus is individual with a disability within meaning of Rehabilitation Act, as in ADA); Robinson v. Henry Ford Health Systems, 892 F.Supp. 176, 180 (E.D.Mich.1994), aff'd 86 F.3d 1156 (6th Cir.1996) (individuals with AIDS or AIDS-related HIV virus are covered as disabled u......
-
Baucom v. DePaul Health Center
...of actions for medical malpractice and for violations of EMTALA is both common and proper. See, e.g., Robinson v. Henry Ford Health Sys., 892 F.Supp. 176, 178 (E.D.Mich.1994). b. Lack of Subject Matter DePaul also moves to dismiss Count II of plaintiff's Amended Complaint on the grounds tha......
-
Is HIV a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act: unanswered questions after Bragdon v. Abbott.
...873 F. Supp. 72, 78 (N.D.Ohio 1994); United States v. Morvant, F. Supp. 1093-94 (E.D.La. 1994); Robinson v. Henry Ford Health Systems, 892 F. Supp. 176, 179 (E.D.Mich. 1994), aff'd mem., 86 F.3d 1156 (6th Cir. 1996); Doe v. Kohn, Nast & Graf, 862 F. Supp. 1310, 1319-1322 (E.D.Pa. 1994);......
-
Stretching the Limits of the Ada: Asymptomatic Hiv-positive Status as a Disability in Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196 (1998)
...Tex. 1995); Austin v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corrections, 876 F. Supp. 1437, 1465 (E.D. Pa. 1995); Robinson v. Henry Ford Health Sys., 892 F. Supp. 176, 180 (E.D. Mich. 1994); Howe v. Hull, 873 F. Supp. 72, 78 (N.D. Ohio 1994); Doe v. Kohn Nast and Graf, P.C., 862 F. Supp. 1310, 1318-20 (E.D......