Robinson v. State, 3 Div. 30

Decision Date06 January 1959
Docket Number3 Div. 30
Citation40 Ala.App. 101,108 So.2d 188
PartiesUral ROBINSON, alias, v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

D. W. Crosland, Montgomery, for appellant.

John Patterson, Atty. Gen., and Geo. D. Mentz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PRICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of subsection (a) of Section 174, Title 14, Code 1940, as amended, which reads: 'No person who has been convicted in this state or elsewhere of committing or attempting to commit a crime of violence shall own a pistol or have one in his possession or under his control.'

The charge of two prior convictions of manslaughter was admitted. It was also stipulated that the service station in which the pistol was found was leased and operated by the appellant.

The evidence for the State tended to show that members of the sheriff's department of Montgomery County searched defendant's premises on April 25, 1957, at 9:00 A.M., having first obtained a search warrant for illegal whiskey. A .38 caliber pistol, loaded with six .38 cartridges, was found in a drawer in a cardboard display cabinet where windshield wiper parts were kept. The cabinet was directly to the right of a desk on which the cash register was placed and behind which Hattie Mae Mathews was sitting, working on books or papers. Defendant said the pistol belonged to Hattie Mae, but admitted he knew it was there. Hattie Mae asked the officers 'Can't a person keep a pistol for her own protection?' and commented about carrying the pistol.

Berry Jackson, testified he worked for defendant from June to Christmas, 1956, and worked as bookkeeper at defendant's service station from January, 1957 to March, 1957; that when he first started working at the service station defendant showed him the pistol and told him it was his, and that defendant took the pistol back and forth; that on the day in January when he showed him the pistol defendant discharged a woman bookkeeper named Mamie; that defendant told him he was going to do bodily harm to Mamie because she had taken $100.00 from him, and that is when defendant showed him the pistol; that defendant had another woman employee named Ora Lee who was working at the front of the station; that he was not acquainted with Hattie Mae Mathews and she was not working at the station when he was there. The witness testified he had been indicted on four separate charges for forging defendant's name to checks; that he had agreed to plead guilty to two of said charges and the other two were nol prossed; that he was in the county jail awaiting sentence.

For the defendant, Hattie Mae Mathews testified she was defendant's bookkeeper, and had been so employed since he leased the service station, and was in charge of the cash register; that Berry Jackson had worked for defendant for not more than two weeks; that no woman other than witness had worked at the station; that she worked different shifts, some days from 7:00 A.M. until 5:00 P.M., and other days she worked from 5:00 P.M. until midnight; that on the days she closed the station at midnight she took the money home with her; that the pistol belonged to her mother. In November she began carrying the pistol back and forth from her home to the station; that she didn't tell defendant she had the pistol but she did tell Benny Fraser, a helper at the station, about the pistol. About a month before the officers came defendant found the pistol and she told him it was hers and asked why she couldn't have protection, but he didn't answer this question. Defendant never handled, owned, or had possession or control over the pistol.

Benny Fraser testified he had worked for defendant for two years; that he told Hattie Mae she should have protection and she showed him the pistol and he knew she was carrying it, but he told her defendant couldn't be around a pistol. He never saw defendant handle the pistol and never heard him mention it until two or three weeks before his arrest when he found out Hattie Mae was carrying it.

Nevada Gray testified Hattie Mae was her daughter; that the pistol belonged to witness' brother who left home in 1920; that she gave Hattie Mae permission to use the pistol.

Defendant testified he leased the service station from the Shell Oil Company on September 6, 1957; that Hattie Mae Mathews works for him as cashier and bookkeeper and when she was alone at the station and closed it at midnight she would take the money that was in the cash register home with her; that his station had been burglarized in January; that he first discovered the pistol when he looked in the drawer of the display cabinet for a windshield wiper blade; that when he asked her about it Hattie Mae said it was hers and he told her 'You know I am not supposed to have a pistol around me' and that she was not supposed to have it there; that he never thought about the pistol again and the next time he saw it was when the officers pulled it out of the drawer; that Berry Jackson had worked for him from the last of January to the 5th day of March and had been fired for forging his name to four checks.

Conviction of a crime of violence having been admitted, proof that defendant subsequently owned a pistol or had one in possession or under his control will justify a conviction of the offense charged.

'In order to establish the unlawful possession of a weapon, actual physical hold thereof is not necessary; constructive possession may be sufficient.' 94 C.J.S. Weapons § 8, p. 492.

The evidence presented questions for the jury's determination as to the ownership, possession or control of the pistol, and was sufficient to support the judgment of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • State v. Yormark
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • November 30, 1971
    ...903, 73 S.Ct. 283, 97 L.Ed. 698 (1952); People v. Johnston, 328 Mich. 213, 43 N.W.2d 334, 340 (Sup.Ct.1950); Robinson v. State, 40 Ala.App. 101, 108 So.2d 188 (Ct.App. 1959); People v. Massey, 196 Cal.App.2d 230, 16 Cal.Rptr. 402, 405 (Ct.App. 1961); Koenigstein v. State, 101 Neb. 229, 162 ......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 29, 1981
    ...otherwise admissible evidence of that offense inadmissible. Mitchell v. State, 140 Ala. 118, 37 So. 76 (1904); Robinson v. State, 40 Ala.App. 101, 108 So.2d 188 (1959). Therefore, the focus of our discussion will be on the admissibility of the evidence concerning the two alleged prior offen......
  • Hayes v. State, CR-96-0298
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 17, 1997
    ...Ex parte Hinton, 548 So.2d 562 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 969, 110 S.Ct. 419, 107 L.Ed.2d 383 (1989); Robinson v. State, 40 Ala.App. 101, 108 So.2d 188 (1959). Based on the foregoing, we find that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of the prior harassment charges brou......
  • Gilbert v. City of Montgomery
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 31, 1976
    ...of the obscenity ordinance, they were properly admitted. Eady v. State, 284 Ala. 327, 224 So.2d 876 (1969); Robinson v. State, 40 Ala.App. 101, 108 So.2d 188 (1959). See 'The Law of Evidence in Alabama' by Judge J. Russell McElroy, Vol. 1, 2nd Ed. pp. 166--169. The defendant complains of er......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT