Robinson v. State

Decision Date05 November 1986
Docket NumberNo. 57075,57075
Citation497 So.2d 440
PartiesOtha Lee ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Mose Lee Sudduth, Jr., Columbus, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before WALKER, C.J., and DAN M. LEE and GRIFFIN, JJ.

WALKER, Chief Justice, for the Court:

Otha Lee Robinson was convicted of murder in the Circuit Court of Lowndes County and sentenced to life imprisonment. From that conviction he appeals. Finding no error, we affirm.

In August of 1980, Otha Lee Robinson, a thirty (30) year old native of Macon, Mississippi, went to Columbus, Mississippi, in search of employment. He arranged to share a house there with James Henry Harris. After several weeks Harris insisted that Robinson move out because Robinson had failed to pay his share of the household expenses.

On the morning of September 9, 1980, Robinson drove to the home of Annie Pearl Cox, Harris' neighbor. He was drinking what he described as "home-brew." During his conversation with Cox, Robinson stated that he was going to kill James Henry Harris. Cox did not believe he was serious.

That same morning Cox and Robinson went to the home of Catherine Williams, who lived nearby. While in the Williams home Robinson went into the bathroom. Immediately afterward, as Robinson left the house, Williams noticed a pistol in his pants pocket.

Robinson then proceeded to Harris' house, where Sid White, another neighbor, happened to be visiting. Sid White was sixty-eight (68) years old. James Henry Harris was also in his sixties and used a walker because of arthritis. Robinson went into the house, shot White, and then shot Harris. White died of a single gunshot wound above the left ear, and Harris was treated for three (3) gunshot wounds to the head.

According to Harris' testimony Robinson walked into the house and, without saying a word, shot White and then Harris.

Robinson's testimony was as follows: When Robinson entered the house, Harris and White accused him of "messing with people's wives and women" and attacked him. Harris was armed with a knife and a length of pipe, and White with a length of pipe. When the men attacked him, Robinson pulled the gun and, as they struggled, the gun fired by accident, striking White. Then Robinson turned and fired at Harris.

Sid White's wife Addie was at home nearby. After hearing the shots, she looked out her window and saw Robinson walk quickly away from Harris' house and get into a passing automobile.

That automobile was driven by Eadie McPeace. McPeace's passenger, who was acquainted with Robinson, asked McPeace to give Robinson a ride. McPeace took Robinson to an automobile repair shop. From there Robinson went to Macon where he turned himself in to the sheriff. There is conflicting testimony as to whether Robinson had sustained a knife wound. When White's body was found, a square-blade knife was in his left hand. His wallet was on the floor near his body.

Robinson was tried in the Circuit Court of Lowndes County. After the jury found him guilty of murder, the trial judge sentenced him to life imprisonment. From that conviction Robinson appeals, assigning one error.

On appeal Robinson raises a single issue: whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of another crime.

At trial the State introduced into evidence several photographs of the deceased. In one of these a wallet was visible a few feet from the body. Robinson testified in his own defense. On cross-examination the district attorney questioned him about the photographs, and the following exchange took place:

Q. I hand you what has been marked State's Exhibit Four and ask you to look at that picture and see if--tell me what that is.

A. (Witness looks at photograph) What?

Q. Can you--I'm pointing to the right corner and ask if you can identify what that is?

A. No, sir, I can't.

Q. Is that not Sid White's wallet?

A. I wouldn't know, sir.

Q. Is it not true that you took that wallet out of his pocket?

MR. KESLER:

To which we object, Your Honor; he's trying to interject the possibility of another crime that's highly prejudicial.

THE COURT:

Overruled.

MR. MONTGOMERY:

Q. Is it not true that you took that wallet out of Sid White's pocket, Otha Lee?

A. No, sir.

Robinson argues that this line of questioning injected into the trial was inadmissible evidence of another crime. As stated in his brief, his claim is that the State attacked him with evidence of other misconduct, completely separate and distinct from the crime charged. We disagree.

Generally, evidence of crimes other than the one for which the accused is on trial is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution. Cabello v. State, 490 So.2d 852 (Miss.1986); Leatherwood v. State, 435 So.2d 645 (Miss.1983); Wilson v. State, 344 So.2d 739 (Miss.1977). The reason for the rule is to preclude the State from raising the "forbidden inferential sequence," that the accused has committed other crimes and is therefore more likely to be guilty of the offense charged. Lancaster v. State, 472 So.2d 363 (Miss.1985); Davis v. State, 377 So.2d 1076 (Miss.1979).

Grounded in the rule's purpose are...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Burns v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 19 d4 Novembro d4 1998
    ...404(b)." Parker v. State, 606 So.2d 1132, 1136-37 (Miss.1992) (citing Lewis v. State, 573 So.2d 719, 722 (Miss.1990); Robinson v. State, 497 So.2d 440, 442 (Miss.1986)). Even evidence not admissible because prejudicial under Rule 403 may be admissible under Rule 404(b). Jenkins v. State, 50......
  • Flowers v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 3 d4 Abril d4 2003
    ...omitted) (emphasis added). See also Davis v. State, 530 So.2d 694 (Miss.1988); McFee v. State, 511 So.2d 130 (Miss.1987); Robinson v. State, 497 So.2d 440 (Miss.1986); Davis v. State, 476 So.2d 608 ¶ 29. In Mackbee, the State was dealing with two crime scenes and two bodies found in the tru......
  • Flowers v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 21 d4 Dezembro d4 2000
    ...other offense formed a single transaction or closely related series of transactions in relation to the crime charged. Robinson v. State, 497 So.2d 440, 442 (Miss.1986). See also Davis v. State, 476 So.2d 608, 609 (Miss.1985). Rule 404(b) is not a blanket prohibition of evidence of other act......
  • Mackbee v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 27 d4 Dezembro d4 1990
    ...State's case in chief. Blanks v. State, 547 So.2d 29, 37 (Miss.1989); Davis v. State, 530 So.2d 694, 697-7 (Miss.1988); Robinson v. State, 497 So.2d 440, 442 (Miss.1986); Walker v. State, 473 So.2d 435, 442 (Miss.1985); Tobias v. State, 472 So.2d 398, 400 (Miss.1985); Neal v. State, 451 So.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT