Robson v. Tomlinson

Decision Date21 February 1891
Citation15 S.W. 456,54 Ark. 229
PartiesROBSON v. TOMLINSON
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

APPEAL from Mississippi Circuit Court, J. E. RIDDICK, Judge.

Liston a merchant at Osceola, Ark. conveyed his stock of goods and accounts to Tomlinson, as trustee for Toof, McGowan & Co. creditors at Memphis, Tenn., to secure a note to them for $ 3700, due five days after date. The instrument of conveyance is in terms as follows:

"This deed, made and entered into this, the 23d day of November 1889, by and between James Liston, of the county of Mississippi, State of Arkansas, party of the first part, and Toof, McGowan & Co., a firm doing business in the city of Memphis, State of Tennessee, as grocery merchants, parties of the second part, and H. D. Tomlinson of the county of Mississippi, State of Arkansas, party of the third part Witnesseth, that the said party of the first part, in consideration of the debt hereinafter mentioned and created and of the sum of one dollar to him in hand paid by the party of the second part, does by these presents bargain, sell, transfer and confirm unto the said party of the third part, the following described realty, goods, wares and merchandise, and all store fixtures, books, and accounts, situated and being in my store in the town of Osceola, in the county of Mississippi, State of Arkansas. (Then follows a description of the property, consisting of a stock of goods, a lot in Osceola, and the books accounts of the debtor.)

"To have and to hold the same with all appurtenances to the party of the third part, and unto his successors in the trust deed, to him, his heirs and assigns forever. In trust, however, for the following purposes: Whereas, the said party of the first part has this day made, executed and delivered to the said party of the second part his note of even date herewith, by which he promises to pay to the said party of the second part or order, for value received, the sum of $ 3711.86 in five days after date. Now, therefore, if the said party of the first part, or anyone for him, shall well and truly pay off and discharge the debt and interest expressed in said note, and every part thereof, when the same becomes due and payable, according to the times, terms, date and effect of said note, then this trust deed shall be void and the property herein transferred and conveyed shall be released at the cost of the party of the first part; but should the said first party fail or refuse to pay the said debt or any part thereof when the same shall become due and payable, as aforesaid, then this trust deed shall remain in full force and effect, and the said party of the third part, or, in case of his death or refusal to act, the acting sheriff of said county of Mississippi, State of Arkansas, at the request of the holders of said note, shall proceed to sell the property hereinbefore described, or any part thereof, at private or public sale, as he may deem best for the interest of the parties of the second part, at the store where they now are, or in some other store in the town of Osceola, Ark. He will sell for cash whether he sells at private or public sale; he may keep the goods in said town of Osceola for cash for the period of six months, unless he should sooner sell the same, or a sufficient amount thereof to satisfy said debt and interest and the expenses incident to the execution of this trust. At the expiration of which time, in the event that all of said debt or said expenses are not paid, and any part of said property described herein remains unsold, then he shall sell the same, or so much as may be necessary to satisfy said debt and expenses in administrating this trust, to the highest bidder for cash, after first giving notice of the time, terms and place of sale of the property to be sold in some newspaper printed in said county of Mississippi; and should he sell at public outcry or at auction at any other time, he shall first give the notice required above; and he is further authorized to receive the proceeds of such sales as he may make, and to execute proper receipts; and should he sell out this lot of goods, wares, store fixtures, books and accounts, notes, merchandise, or any part thereof, he may employ such desired assistance as may be necessary to properly carry on such retail business, but in no event shall he employ more than two clerks; and should he sell all or any part of said property at public sale he may employ an auctioneer to make the sales; and the said party of the third part is hereby given immediate possession of the above described property. And such trustee shall, out of the proceeds of the said sales, pay first the cost and expenses of executing this trust, including legal compensation to the trustee for his services, and next shall apply the proceeds remaining over to the payment of said debt and interest, or so much thereof as remains unpaid, and the remainder, if any, to the party of the first part; and the said party of the third part covenants faithfully to perform and fulfill the trust herein created, not being liable for any mischance beyond ordinary care of the said property.

"In witness whereof, the said parties have hereunto signed and set their seals the day and year first above written. All erasures and interlineations herein were made before the signing and reading thereof.

JAS. LISTON, [L. S.]

TOOF. MCGOWAN & CO.

By E. L. McGowan. [L. S.]

H. D. TOMLINSON" [L. S.]

Robson Block & Co., creditors of Liston, brought suit and caused an attachment to be levied upon the stock of goods. Tomlinson interpleaded, and set up...

To continue reading

Request your trial
41 cases
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Tomlinson
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1901
    ...368; 65 Ark. 67. Cockrill & Cockrill, for appellee. There being evidence to sustain the verdict, it will be sustained. 53 Ark. 75, 80; 54 Ark. 229, 234; 14 Ark. 21; 25 Ark. 90; Ark. 385; 13 Ark. 285; 13 Ark. 694. The evidence warranted a finding of negligence on the part of the railway. 65 ......
  • Smead v. Chandler
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1903
    ... ... but a mortgage, if its object was to secure the payment of ... debts, as in this case. Robson v ... Tomlinson, 54 Ark. 229, 15 S.W. 456; ... Richmond v. Miss. Mills, 52 Ark ... 30, 11 S.W. 960; Fecheimer v. Robertson, 53 ... ...
  • Adler-Goldman Commission Company v. Phillips
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 17, 1896
    ...in the absence of a trustee, by a chancery court. 4 Ark. 302; 53 id. 124, 130. On the question of intention, the verdict is conclusive. 54 Ark. 229. (b) deed is not fraudulent because it provides that until default the debtors "may proceed to sell * * * goods in the regular order of busines......
  • Schuman v. Sanderson
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1904
    ... ... law cases, and it has been extended even to a written agreed ... statement of facts. Marshall v. Dossett, 57 ... Ark. 93, 20 S.W. 810; Robson v. Tomlinson, ... 54 Ark. 229, 15 S.W. 456. In chancery cases it has been ... frequently said that, as the appellate court has the same ... record ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT