Rodriguez v. State, 08-87-00111-CR

Decision Date18 November 1987
Docket NumberNo. 08-87-00111-CR,08-87-00111-CR
Citation743 S.W.2d 683
PartiesFrank RODRIGUEZ, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Ron Ponton, El Paso, for appellant.

Steve W. Simmons, Dist. Atty., El Paso, for appellee.

Before OSBORN, C.J., and SCHULTE and WOODARD, JJ.

OPINION ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

Frank Rodriguez, Jr. was found guilty by a jury in the 327th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, of the offense of theft of $750.00 or more, but less than $20,000.00, and the jury set his punishment at five years' confinement, a $5,000.00 fine and recommended probation as to the confinement. The court sentenced him on January 14, 1987.

On May 19, 1987, his attorney filed in this Court a "Motion For Extension Of Time To File Statement Of Facts." That motion recited that notice of appeal was given on January 14, 1987, that a motion for new trial was filed on February 18, 1987, and that the motion was overruled as a matter of law on March 29, 1987. The motion was denied and the attempted appeal dismissed. A motion for rehearing was filed. That motion was overruled and the Court wrote a per curiam opinion noting that the motion to extend the time to file the statement of facts was not timely filed. No motion was ever filed to extend the time to file the transcript.

On October 28, 1987, this Court received a "Motion To Extend Time To File Transcript." It recites that the motion for new trial was filed on February 13, 1987, that it was overruled on March 29, 1987, and that notice of appeal was filed on April 13, 1987. The present motion recites that one prior motion to extend time to file transcript was filed on May 19, 1987. No such motion has been filed in this Court.

The present motion recites that Mr. Rodriguez filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in 120th Judicial District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and that the writ was granted on October 26, 1987. The motion further states that the relief granted was an out-of-time appeal in the cause which this Court dismissed on May 20, 1987.

The motion to extend the time to file the transcript will not be filed. Even if the motion for new trial was filed on February 13, 1987, as is now stated, and was timely filed, the record had to be filed in this appeal 100 days after sentence was imposed. Rule 54(b), Tex.R.App.P. That deadline expired on April 24, 1987. A motion to extend the time for filing could have been filed within fifteen days after the last date for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Supreme Judicial Dist.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 5, 1989
    ...Court of Criminal Appeals" and in holding the district court had no jurisdiction to grant an out-of-time appeal. Rodriguez v. State, 743 S.W.2d 683 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1987), no The Eighth Court of Appeals contends that Renier, supra, does not apply to relator's cause in that Renier, supra, ......
  • Strickland v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 12, 1991
    ...documents should be filed. See Savery v. State, 767 S.W.2d 242 (Tex.App.--Beaumont 1989, no pet.); Rodriguez v. State, 743 S.W.2d 683 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1987, pet. ref'd); Swann v. State, 737 S.W.2d 623 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1987, no pet.). It is not necessary to repeat all the valid reason......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT