Roe v. Roe

Citation66 S.E. 482,7 Ga.App. 142
Decision Date10 December 1909
Docket Number1,944.
PartiesROE v. ROE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

No error of law is complained of, and the verdict is so clearly and strongly supported by the evidence that the judgment refusing a new trial is affirmed, and the motion for the defendant in error for 10 per cent. damages on the amount of the judgment for delay in suing out the writ of error and bringing the case to this court is granted. Civ. Code 1895, § 5094.

Error from City Court of Nashville; H. B. Peeples, Judge.

Action between Allen Roe and Eliza Roe. From the judgment, Allen Roe brings error. Affirmed.

J. W. Powell, for plaintiff in error.

W. D. Buie, for defendant in error.

HILL, C.J.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT