Roesler v. Citizens' Bank of Memphis
| Decision Date | 30 April 1886 |
| Parties | ROESLER et al., Appellants, v. THE CITIZENS' BANK MEMPHIS. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Scotland Circuit Court.--HON. BEN. E TURNER, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
John C. Moore for appellants.
Smith & Krauthoff and N. M. Pettingill for respondent.
No bill of exceptions in this cause as there is no order of the court authenticating what purports to be such bill. Under the uniform ruling of this court, there is nothing left to consider but the record proper, and as there is no error therein, judgment is affirmed. Dinwiddie v. Jacobs, 82 Mo 195.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
The State ex rel. Chapman v. Walbridge
... ... [54 S.W. 450] ... v. Portland, 79 Me. 484, 10 A. 458; Memphis v ... Woodward, 12 Heiskell 499; People [153 Mo. 204] ... ex rel. v ... ...
-
State v. Sanders
... ... exceptions for consideration in this cause. Roester v ... Bank, 88 Mo. 565; Dinwiddie v. Jacobs, 82 Mo ... 195, and cases cited. (2) ... ...
-
Ricketts v. Hart
...v. Thompson, 66 Mo. 661; Lumber Co. v. Howard, 76 Mo. 517; Dinwiddie v. Jacobs, 82 Mo. 195; LaFollette v. Thompson, 83 Mo. 199; Roesler v. Bank, 88 Mo. 565; State Rolley, 135 Mo. 677. Recitals in the bill of exceptions will not supply the record proper. Walser v. Wear, 128 Mo. 652. (3) The ......
-
State v. Harris
...Dinwiddie v. Jacobs, 82 Mo. 195; Pope v. Thompson, 66 Mo. 661; Lumber Co. v. Howard, 76 Mo. 517; McGrew v. Foster, 66 Mo. 30; Roesler v. Bank, 88 Mo. 565. Neither indorsement of the filing on the back of the bill by the clerk, nor the certificate of the judge that it is signed, sealed and m......
Request a trial to view additional results