Roetzel v. State
Decision Date | 15 December 1900 |
Citation | 60 S.W. 27,68 Ark. 487 |
Parties | ROETZEL v. STATE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from White Circuit Court, HANCE N. HUTTON, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
Grant Green, for appellant.
Jeff Davis and Chas. Jacobson, for appellee.
OPINION
The indictment charges that Frank Roetzel "on the 22d day of December, 1899, in the county of White aforesaid, then and there unlawfully did catch fish with a net in the waters of this state, to-wit: Horseshoe lake, said fish not then and there being caught for family use, nor for a picnic."
There was proof from which the jury might have found that defendant assisted in seining Horseshoe lake with a seine over 60 feet in length, and the meshes of which were less than 4 inches apart; that fish were taken from said lake; and that defendant, took two of them home with him. There was evidence also to the effect that the meshes of the seine were 4 inches or over.
The court read to the jury the act of June 26, 1897, and gave the following instructions:
The defendant asked, but the court refused, to instruct the jury as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fritz v. State
...in the opinion of the Legislature, is for the best interests of the public and for the preservation of such fish and game. 56 Ark. 267; 68 Ark. 487; 68 Ark. 73 Ark. 248. It was manifestly the intention of the Legislature to provide a general system of laws for the preservation of fish and g......
-
Richardson v. State
...District; ALLEN HUGHES, Judge; affirmed. Affirmed. Driver & Harrison, for appellant. 1. The verdict is not supported by the evidence. 68 Ark. 487. It the result of prejudice, and should be reversed. 5 Ark. 394; 21 Ark. 468; 13 Ark. 712; 24 Ark. 224; 40 Ark. 168; 44 Ark. 121; 46 Ark. 141. 2.......
-
Strickland v. Little Rock
... ... The facts ... are, substantially, as follows: B. S. Farrow, a sanitary ... policeman of the city of Little Rock, in this state, was ... instructed to examine the premises of appellant. He went to ... his shop at 908 Main street, in said city; went into the ... alley behind ... ...
- State v. Billingsley